The uselessness of high phosphorus levels

penfold2(4b, MN)March 25, 2011

A recent thread (and many others) prompted me to write this, but I figured it would be more appropriate in its own thread.

So I see these high phosphorus "bloom booster" formulas used and recommended pretty frequently, and it bugs me a bit because I see no justification for it. I thought I'd toss out some data and see what everyone thinks. Here are a couple of threads on the use of high P fertilizers on plants in general.

The uselessness of high P fertilizers (I found the email from Dyna-Gro's own CEO to be particularly enlightening.)

Bloom Boosters - How Much P is Enough?

And here's an article I found which lists the tissue composition of several orchids. Apparently the information was taken from a book which stated that tissue composition was found to be very similar among different species of orchids.

Care & Feeding of Orchids

And the data:







Iron Leaves






0.01 Roots







If we average the values for leaves and roots, we get an N-P-K ratio of 1.9-0.25-3.2. If we then compensate for the P2O5 and K2O units that fertilizers are measured in, we get 1.9-0.57-3.86. And that is about equivalent to a 10-3-20 ratio. This matches the data presented in the first two links pretty closely, except for a considerably higher potassium requirement. I see no data anywhere however, that suggests that plants use the crazy amounts of phosphorus present in bloom booster formulas. When using these fertilizers to supply the proper amount of N and K, the excess P just raises the TDS (total dissolved solids) to higher concentrations which could potentially burn roots.

I know there will be people who say "Well I use such-and-such fertilizer with great results," but the problem only occurs when we are pushing the limits of fertilizing. High fertilizer use during peak growth, and plants that are very sensitive to high TDS levels are the problem areas. High P fertilizers may work with many species at low to moderate concentrations, but there's no sense in creating a potential problem by supplying many times more P than a plant will ever use.

FWIW, I use Dyna-Grow 9-3-6, and have never had trouble with blooms. I am however, now considering adding some Pro-Tekt 0-0-3 after seeing how much K was found in the above study.

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
albertan(Florida (10))

I think the term "bloom booster" is a misnomer. It stimulates the growth of new roots, and used every third fertilizing will initite blooming if it is TIME for the plant to bloom. It is used judiciously by some growers preparing for sales in shows, or specific holiday sales.

    Bookmark   March 26, 2011 at 1:52AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
penfold2(4b, MN)

It has been shown that reducing nitrogen while maintaining other nutrient levels can initiate blooming, but I've never seen any evidence that excess phosphorus stimulates anything in plants. This seems to be a long held myth among growers. In the first link I provided, a fertilizer company's own CEO stated that their bloom booster formula is made because of consumer demand for it, not because of any scientific evidence of its usefulness. "...It is simpler to give the market what they think they need than to try to reeducate it."

Of course people are free to use whatever they feel is best. I just like to see people looking at the evidence rather than looking at what others do. That's how myths get perpetuated.

    Bookmark   March 26, 2011 at 10:17AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
orchid126(z6, NJ)

As long as there are threads like this one with information from knowledgeable growers, perhaps someday the public will become re-educated. Much food for thought. Many thanks.

    Bookmark   March 26, 2011 at 4:34PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
tcuser(ZONE 7)

"It has been shown that reducing nitrogen while maintaining other nutrient levels can initiate blooming"

Your sentence proves that there is something not quite right with your theory. You reduce Nitrogen of 20-20-20 fertilizer (high phosphorus) to 6.6-20-20 to initiate blooming. Your fertilizer is almost the same with commercial 10-30-30 fertilizer (high phosphorus, blooming fertilizer).

    Bookmark   March 30, 2011 at 10:27AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
penfold2(4b, MN)

I was talking about starting with a fertilizer like the 9-3-6 that I use, and switching to something like a 6-3-6. The N is reduced to 6 while maintaining P and K at 3 and 6.

The exact numbers will vary depending on what fertilizer you use. My point was just that I would always keep the middle number the smallest.

    Bookmark   March 30, 2011 at 4:42PM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
orcid roots really short
do i need to worry alot about not getting the plant...
Katie Parker
Should I cut off this leaf?
This may have started from misting or too much light...
My Orchids need help!!!
I have had these orchids for almost a year now. I have...
My Garden Orcs
Hi I wanted to share the heralding of Spring in the...
What's wrong with my phan?
Hi, I need some help with my orchid. This is what happened: The...
Sponsored Products
Modern Fan Company | Solus Ceiling Fan
$384.00 | YLighting
Le Corbusier: LC3 Grande Lounge Chair Reproduction
Modern Classics Furniture
Progress Lighting 8 In. Pro-Optic White Baffle Trim P8117-28
$68.85 | Home Depot
French Burgundy Ovo Table Lamp
$99.99 | Lamps Plus
Couristan Anatolia 2715/0705 Royal Plume Area Rug - Navy/Port Wine Multicolor -
$399.00 | Hayneedle
Koncept Gen 3 Z-Bar Solo Daylight LED Silver Desk Lamp
Euro Style Lighting
Hand-tufted Brown Contemporary Genrich Wool Abstract Rug (8' Round)
Robert Abbey Blake 11" High Bronze Wall Sconce
Lamps Plus
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™