GramHat, Larry Daniels, and Tina Marie

kristimamaMay 12, 2011

Just wondering... are Larry Daniels and Tina Marie also thornless, or as nearly thornless, as Grandmother's Hat?

Also wondering how they bloom. Vintage Gardens makes a subtle distinction in their blooming... saying that Larry Daniels is "Rapid" while the other two are only "good".

Thanks,

Kmama

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jerijen(Zone 10)

In my experience, (and we've grown a LOT of plants, from different sources) they are identical in all characteristics, other than color.
And, at that, many (tho not all) plants sport back and forth.

I would say there is no difference in their repeat.
They all crank up to re-bloom as soon as they're deadheaded. They all bloom through the calendar year for us, here near the Ventura Co. (CA) coast.

Jeri
(Who is leaving later today to travel slowly up to the Bay Area, for Celebration.)

    Bookmark   May 12, 2011 at 12:10PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
nastarana(5a)

Jeri, Do you think it possible that Larry Daniels might be the original OGR, and Grandmother's Hat the sport, which might tend to revert to the original?

    Bookmark   May 12, 2011 at 1:05PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jerijen(Zone 10)

Sure. That's possible. OR Tina Marie might be the original. The problem is, we are unlikely EVER to find proof, one way or another.

The rose grows at Sangerhausen.
But the labeling at Sangerhausen is problematical because with one problem and another, there's no clear line of identification. (Sangerhausen's loss of id on some roses is the source of some odd mistakes -- such as the confusion between 'Pink Gruss an Aachen' and 'Irene Watts.')

I think that, unless someone comes up with REALLY good evidence, they are going to just have the names they have, and as long as we all know what roses we're talking about I personally have no big problem with that.

"The roses know who they are . . ." Lee Jeremias said that, and it always made sense to me.

Jeri

    Bookmark   May 12, 2011 at 2:44PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
roseseek

The nurseryman who helped popularize Grandmother's Hat and isolated and named Larry Daniels and Tina Marie stated a full thirty percent of the plants he produced "reverted" to Larry Daniels. Sports occur serendipitously. Reversions, I've read, frequently occur about 30% of the time. Based upon that piece of information, I would think Larry is the original and the other two are sports. Whatever they are, they are great roses! Kim

    Bookmark   May 13, 2011 at 4:01PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jerijen(Zone 10)

But Kim -- How could he distinguish a sport from a reversion?

Jeri

    Bookmark   May 13, 2011 at 7:39PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
roseseek

Hi Jeri, that's actually easier than you think. When you have Grandmother's Hat in for propagation and three out of ten come out Larry Daniels, it would be considered a "reversion" as it is reverting back to its original form. It is virtually unheard of to have any rose "sport" from the original to a new combination at such a high rate. Mutations are known to revert to their original form that frequently, though. That's what convinced him Larry Daniels is, or is as close to what we're going to find, the original from which Grandmother's Hat sported. Kim

    Bookmark   May 14, 2011 at 1:44AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
I'm addicted to white roses , what is your addiction?
And I can't seem to stop wanting those I find ! I love...
Lilyfinch z7 mid tn
close cousins of Belinda's Dream?
BD looks like a great landcaping/cutting rose, but...
Adam Harbeck
William R. Smith
Does anyone know how this compares to Maman Cochet...
titian1 10b
giving up
most of my clippings and practically all of my past...
Campanula UK Z8
Help with ID of old white rose?
This rose belongs to a friend, and I'm hoping for a...
vmr423
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™