Are tulips with tulip breaking virus GMOs?

albert_135(Sunset 2 or 3)January 13, 2013

Many take great interest in avoiding GMOs. Are tulips with tulip breaking virus GMOs?

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
albert_135(Sunset 2 or 3)

On another forum persons opined that a tulip infected by a ''natural'' virus like tulip breaking virus was not a GMO but were it infected by a manufactured virus then it would be a GMO. Is this an accepted technical definition jargon or just an opinion street jargon?

This post was edited by albert_135 on Mon, Jan 28, 13 at 12:19

    Bookmark   January 22, 2013 at 9:34AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
albert_135(Sunset 2 or 3)

Here is the best attempt at definition I have found.

To make regulation possible, we (scientists, regulators, etc.) think of genetically modified organisms as those that humans have purposefully modified using recombinant DNA technologies. Recombinant DNA is defined as "molecules that are constructed outside living cells by joining natural or synthetic DNA segments to DNA molecules that can replicate in a living cell, or (ii) molecules that result from the replication of those described in (i) above." (link). Basically, sticking together two pieces of DNA that aren't found together in nature. This can mean re-arranging an organism's own DNA, giving it DNA from another organism, or giving it completely synthetic DNA.

So, a wild-type, unengineered tulip mosaic virus is not recombinant or GMO. A tulip infected with the virus is also not GMO, because the process of genetic modifcation that results from the infection has not been intentionally modified by humans.

It's a slippery slope because introducing tulip mosaic virus into a line that hasn't previously been infected does result in genetic changes that were intended by humans. But, the vehicle doing the modification (the virus) is not modified, it's just doing what it's always done. We (scientists, regulators, etc.) don't consider that GMO, but one could easily make the argument that it is.

This post was edited by albert_135 on Wed, Jan 30, 13 at 16:36

    Bookmark   January 30, 2013 at 3:22PM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Brassicaceae and Cruciferae
Do Brassicaceae and Cruciferae mean the same? Apparently...
What is the academic reasons for why only some grafts work?
Persons grafting usually use similar plants, citrus...
Sructure name?
Plant is a Callisia but would appreciate help with...
ok to grow an entire poplation of plants from one motherplant?
If i were to buy a single flowering, hardy pond plant,...
A Question about hybrid vegatable seeds...
Hello all. I feel that this is very basic and that...
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™