number of taxons

gillmass(5a)October 16, 2009

could someone give me an estimated number of families, orders and genera extant in the world today.

thanks.

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
brandon7 TN_zone(7)

Any answer you get is going to have about as many caveats as the number of species. Basically, no one knows. The actually scientifically classified species and genera only represent a small part of the actual ones in existence. It might seem that when you step up to the family classification or above, that things would get simpler, but unfortunately, it only gets more complex at that level with mass changes on practically a daily basis. We haven't come close to counting the number of species, and are barely even getting started on trying to understand their relationships to each other.

Here are some quick google results that might shed some light on your question:

The estimated number of animals on our planet falls somewhere in the vast range of 3-30 million species (Erwin 1983, Wolosz 1988). (see link below)

The National Science FoundationÂs "Tree of Life" project estimates that there could be anywhere from 5 million to 100 million species on the planet, but science has only identified about 2 million. (Life Science, http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/070803_gm_numberspecies.html )

Here is a link that might be useful: How Many (Animal) Species Inhabit Our Planet

    Bookmark   October 20, 2009 at 11:59AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
gillmass(5a)

thanks for your response. do you think i would have more success if i narrowed my question to--how many orders, families and genera are there in the cronquist classification system?
what puzzles me further is that i can go to a genus and learn how many species there are or go to a family and determine how many genera there are in it but no answer for how many overall families, orders or genera there are.i'm only interested in plants not animals. how about some good old fashioned guessing? anyone?

    Bookmark   October 20, 2009 at 1:02PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
lycopus(z5 NY)

Based on what I have on hand I would guess about 150 orders of plants. Families and genera are going to be considerably higher. Someone who has access to a complete database would be able to give a pretty accurate number in a minimal amount of time. I don't have access to such a database though.

    Bookmark   October 20, 2009 at 4:30PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
brandon7 TN_zone(7)

"How many (known and generally accepted) orders, families, and genera (of angiosperms) are there in the Cronquist classification system?"

If you limit your search to that degree, Wikipedia reports,"The (Cronquist) system, as laid out in An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants (1981), counts 321 families and 64 orders."

    Bookmark   October 28, 2009 at 10:02AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
pineresin

Though of course Cronquist is very out-of-date and not much used any more . . .

Resin

    Bookmark   October 29, 2009 at 11:10AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
garyfla_gw(10 Florida)

Hi
Only family I even remotely keep up with is orchids and last I heard they still are the most diverse most lists say around 30,000 specie 2000 natural hybrids. 60,000 man made
with over 200 man made genus. While I recently heard of 150 new species within the last 5 years no new genus.
Of couse if your reading is over a week old you'll find somebody somewhere revising everything all over again lol.
can't imagine actually counting animal species .I'd bet money plants will prove impossible even if you stick to flowering plants alone. gary

    Bookmark   November 17, 2009 at 6:41AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
gillmass(5a)

my final estimate is:

orders: 100 +/-
families: 400 +/_
genera: 15,000 +/-
species: 250,000 +/-

would love to hear an opposing view.

    Bookmark   November 21, 2009 at 6:35PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
garyfla_gw(10 Florida)

Hi
Can't help with the question but was wondering about classification of deep sea life forms or those (Plants?)
found growing in crystals?? bacteria growing in volcanoes.
Seemingly defying all the accepted norms of what makes life possible at all.??
Imagine the chaos if life forms are discovered that are not carbon based?? If (When?) life is discovered on another planet can't imagine what it will do to the naming system lol.??. I can't even keep up with the NEW words being generated by ( What is a planet or a ballpark on how many there are ??.lol Oh well will bump your post up. I'm curious as to the answers myself gary

    Bookmark   November 24, 2009 at 6:31AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
brandon7 TN_zone(7)

Gillmass, if you are still around,

Somehow I missed your "final estimate" post back when this thread was current. I notice (even without the study I will mention later) that your data is far, far below even the cataloged numbers! I hope your post wasn't part of a school paper or something, because I bet the results would not have been good.

Anyway, I saw an interesting paper the other day on this subject and thought I'd post a link. According to a new study, which seems to have quite a bit of support, the total number of species on Earth is predicted to be around 8.75 million. The paper is linked below.

Here is a link that might be useful: How Many Species....

    Bookmark   November 12, 2011 at 10:54PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
freki(5a)

can't imagine actually counting animal species

& no one wants to even think about the domains outside of Eukaryota (Bacteria & Archaea). You can't even get a count on "kingdoms" in those.

The problem is that modern taxonomy is based on systems and models that are several centuries old. There are attempts to address the issues (via cladistics & molecular phylogenies) but there's a lot of resistance, especially from the public.

In a cladistic taxonomy, you don't have genera, families, orders, etc. Everything is a clade, with smaller clades within larger clades. It doesn't sound like a huge difference, but it is. It also matches what we see in nature better.

"That way lies madness, and cladistics. But I repeat myself" - James Valentine, "On The Origin of Phyla"

    Bookmark   May 28, 2012 at 9:48AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Cold stratification & "tricking" seeds
Was originally posted here, in the Growing from Seed...
actionclaw
Plant ID needed!
Can you please ID this plant for me? It is potted in...
RPost78
fyi, ubc botanical garden forums has a plant science forum
Plants: Science and Cultivation Disregard. Almost no...
albert_135
bougainvillea seeds germinating
i have sown bougainvillea seeds 30 days ago but there...
calipso108
What is the academic reasons for why only some grafts work?
Persons grafting usually use similar plants, citrus...
albert_135
Sponsored Products
Altus Ceiling Fan with Optional Light by Modern Fan Company
$280.00 | Lumens
Hudson Valley Petersburg Nickel Semi-Flush Ceiling Light
Lamps Plus
GK Five Lamp 100 Watt Glass Shade Flexible Monorail Kit
Euro Style Lighting
Contemporary Indoor/Outdoor Area Rug: Chandra Rugs Gems Multi-Colored 9 ft. x
Home Depot
World Imports Beyond Modern Collection 3light Light Fluorescent Flushmount
Overstock.com
Chrome Modern Heated Towel Rack Radiator Rail 47.25 x 23.5 & Valves
Hudson Reed
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™