Question about crosses

TNY78(7a-East TN)January 19, 2014

This is probably a silly question, and I almost feel ridiculous asking, but I can't find the answer anywhere online...

I've been crossing my own daylilies for a couple of years, and completely understand how the process of intentionally crossing daylilies works....but...what I can't find is how the crosses work when pods form and I haven't crossed them. For example, I had quite a few pods set on Big Kiss, but didn't intentionally use it as a pod parent. it Big Kiss x Unknown, or Big Kiss x Big Kiss? I always harvest them, but I don't know what the proper way to label them is. I don't know whether to thank the bees for taking pollen from another daylily, or if it self-pollinated...or!


Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Julia NY(6)

BIG KISS X UNKNOWN is the way I would label it since I would have no idea if it was a cross of itself or pollen carried from a nearby plant.
BTW, no question is silly.


    Bookmark   January 20, 2014 at 7:47AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
TNY78(7a-East TN)

Thanks Julia :) I feel like that's something I should have already known, but I just couldn't find the answer! That's how I've been labeling them, but then I think I started to overthink it...


    Bookmark   January 20, 2014 at 1:50PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
alameda/zone 8

I breed horses - when we show pedigree information, we do thusly: [father x mother]. When I have a pod like yours that is fertilized by the bees or ?? I label [unknown x Big Kiss], as I look at the plant with the pod as the mother. I wouldn't think it matters, as long as you know which is which. The opposite may be correct in plant breeding. This is just easier for me to remember since I have classified my horses this way for so many years.

    Bookmark   February 15, 2014 at 11:33AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
TNY78(7a-East TN)

I'm not positive either, but I think in daylilies its POD PARENT X POLLEN PARENT. In this case, I would know the pod parent (mother), but not the pollen parent (father). That's how I've been listing them anyway. I may have it totally backward though :)

I have horses, but I never thought about how their pedigree was set up. i'll have to take a look at their papers. :)

This post was edited by TNY78 on Sat, Feb 15, 14 at 18:23

    Bookmark   February 15, 2014 at 6:12PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
dementieva(Zone 9 - Houston)

Tammy is right -- Correct notation is POD x POLLEN (or MOTHER x FATHER if you want to think of it that way).

If it helps, normally UNKNOWN will always come last (NAME x UNK). The only way to get UNK x NAME is if you are crossing onto plants that you can't identify or your labels get partially lost.

As for horses, I think we can all be glad that they never self-pollinate. :o)


    Bookmark   February 16, 2014 at 8:41AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

If I recall correctly, the Reinkes used to (and perhaps still do) use the notation of POD PARENT x Chance, when the pollen parent was unknown. (Whether or not these "Chance" pods were all strictly bee pods I don't know... but it sounds better to me than "unknown".)

Right now I am trying to germinate seed from a seedling of uncertain ancestry. (The seedling was planted just prior to rotator cuff surgery, iirc, and in my haste to get several last minute garden things done I did not make a record/map of what seedlings were planted out, never mind where. Critters did for the label before I could pay the seedlings any attention. Somehow the list of what seedlings I *did* have (regardless of whether or not they got planted) got lost.) The hybridizing clip on one of the pods was lost, meaning that not only do I not know what the pod parent for the cross is, I also don't know what the pollen parent is! In the unlikely event that the seedlings (if any) from this seed thrive and one is worthy of registration (hah!), I would have to list the parentage as "Sdlg x unknown".

(Fwiw I do have strong suspicions as to the ancestry of the seedling - at least with respect to one ancestor - and there were a limited number of prospective pollen parents I would have used. Unfortunately, I did not record each and every cross as I made it; it is much easier to just clip the pod and sort it all out and record the data when the seed is collected. Doubly unfortunate (and just to add more confusion), last season I made some spontaneous and unplanned crosses, and I also deliberately let the bees set some pods, and one or the other might have been true for this seedling (or the bees might have beaten me to it). Aieeee! It will either be fun - or frustrating - to try to guess "who's the daddy".)

    Bookmark   March 8, 2014 at 4:24PM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Aphids on daylilies
What do you do about aphids on your daylilies? I don't...
Pretty Pinks Posing Prettily
There were a lot of pinks drawing my attention in the...
Suicidal gardenia post OT
Don't know if any of you ever read this. It's worth...
Patty W. zone 5a Illinois
Lambert daylilies
would love to see pics of John Lambert daylilies ....
Daylily Grab Bag
I found a plant sale given by our local Daylily Society....
Sponsored Products
AICO Furniture - Lavelle Blanc 6 Piece King Wing Mansion Bedroom...
Great Furniture Deal
AICO Furniture - Palais Royale Triple Dresser in Rococo Cognac -...
Great Furniture Deal
AICO Furniture - The Acasa Sideboard with Mirror - 36007-36067-38
Great Furniture Deal
AICO Furniture - Beverly Blvd Upholstered Eastern King Bed -...
Great Furniture Deal
AICO Furniture - Oppulente Fireplace - 67220-52
Great Furniture Deal
Hampton Bay Ceiling Fans Torrington 52 in. Cottage Wood Ceiling Fan AC446-CW
Home Depot
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™