# Limited Equivalent Conductivities and the use of EC meters

greystoke(South Africa(11))November 26, 2009

In the first place I would like to plead with our members to NEVER-EVER use a dedicated TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) meter, or the ppm scale on your EC meter. Always use the EC (or ÂµS) scale.

The reason ?

Well, there are no such things as tds-meters. Those devices that you stick in a watery solution, which then display a tds in ppm are in fact converted EC-meters, which measure the reverse electrical resistance of the solution, and the problem those meters have is that they cannot add ppm values together without serious errors.

Example:

LetÂs say that you have a solution of 100 ppm Potassium Nitrate, and a solution of 100 ppm Calcium Nitrate. Suppose you mix the two solutions and stick in your tds meter to check, expecting to read 200 ppm, but . . . alas, because, depending on the meter you bought, it will either read more or it will read less, but never: 200 ppm (100+100).

However, if you were to use the EC-scale you would read: 143 ÂµS for the KNO3 solution, and 123 ÂµS for the Ca(NO3)2 solution. And Â surprise . . surprise Â the mixed solution will read: 266 ÂµS.

Many members have come short on this confusing aspect of EC-meters, and many have adopted fallacious ways of suiting the ppm-scale. That wasnÂt necessary. All that was needed is to change-over to the EC-scale.

But how do you relate grams per liter (ppm) to conductivities ?

The answer is that every type of anion and kation contributes its own conductivity to the solution. However, these contributions are known to science, and they are called: Limited Equivalent Conductivities (LEC), and are generally quoted in ÂµS/ppm/mol.

Example:

KNO3 -100 ppm has a total LEC of 73.5 + 71.4 = Â±145 ÂµS/ppm/mol, = 145*100/101 = 143 ÂµS

Ca(NO3)2 Â 100ppm has a total LEC of 59.5 +2x71.4 = Â±202 ÂµS/ppm/mol, = 202*100/164 = 123 ÂµS

Note:

A) Strictly speaking, LECs are not constants, and valid only in low concentrations. Particularly low dissociated salts (salts of weak acids such as acetates and bicarbonates) may give problems. However, in our hobby that hardly ever applies, and the errors caused by it are not significant for our purpose.

Even so, I personally try to stick to the area around 1000 ÂµS, and if necessary I dilute a sample of a strong nutrient solution 1:1 with RO water, just to do a reading.

B) Tap water also has a conductivity, and you need to measure it before using, so that you can subtract its value from your reading to arrive at your nutrients concentration. You can also try to incorporate the calcium content into your formulas, but then, you need to know what you are doing.

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
greystoke(South Africa(11))

Greystoke wrote:Example:
LetÂs say that you have a solution of 100 ppm Potassium Nitrate, and a solution of 100 ppm Calcium Nitrate. Suppose you mix the two solutions and stick in your tds meter to check, expecting to read 200 ppm, but . . . alas, because, depending on the meter you bought, it will either read more or it will read less, but never: 200 ppm (100+100).
However, if you were to use the EC-scale you would read: 143 ÂµS for the KNO3 solution, and 123 ÂµS for the Ca(NO3)2 solution. And Â surprise . . surprise Â the mixed solution will read: 266 ÂµS.
This is not what I meant to say: The salts should be mixed together. Not the solutions. Doing it as descibed you would - of course - get the average of the two, ie: 133 ÂµS, although the relative error would still be the same.

November 26, 2009 at 12:45AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
greystoke(South Africa(11))

Just for those who don't want to get confused: The corrected version:

In the first place I would like to plead with our members to NEVER-EVER use a dedicated TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) meter, or the ppm scale on your EC meter. Always use the EC (or ÂµS) scale.
The reason ?
Well, there are no such things as tds-meters. Those devices that you stick in a watery solution, which then display a tds in ppm are in fact converted EC-meters, which measure the reverse electrical resistance of the solution, and the problem those meters have is that they cannot add ppm values together without serious errors.
Example:
LetÂs say that you have a solution of 100 ppm Potassium Nitrate, and a solution of 100 ppm Calcium Nitrate. Suppose you make a mixed solution of the two salts and stick in your tds meter to check, expecting to read 200 ppm, but . . . alas, because, depending on the meter you bought, it will either read more or it will read less, but never: 200 ppm (100+100).
However, if you were to use the EC-scale you would read: 143 ÂµS for the KNO3 solution, and 123 ÂµS for the Ca(NO3)2 solution. And Â surprise . . surprise Â the mixed solution will read: 266 ÂµS.
Many members have come short on this confusing aspect of EC-meters, and many have adopted fallacious ways of suiting the ppm-scale. That wasnÂt necessary. All that was needed is to change-over to the EC-scale.
But how do you relate grams per liter (ppm) to conductivities ?
The answer is that every type of anion and kation contributes its own conductivity to the solution. However, these contributions are known to science, and they are called: Limited Equivalent Conductivities (LEC), and are generally quoted in ÂµS/ppm/mol.

Example:
KNO3 -100 ppm has a total LEC of 73.5 + 71.4 = Â±145 ÂµS/ppm/mol, = 145*100/101 = 143 ÂµS
Ca(NO3)2 Â 100ppm has a total LEC of 59.5 +2x71.4 = Â±202 ÂµS/ppm/mol, = 202*100/164 = 123 ÂµS
Note:
A) Strictly speaking, LECs are not constants, and valid only in low concentrations. Particularly low dissociated salts (salts of weak acids such as acetates and bicarbonates) may give problems. However, in our hobby that hardly ever applies, and the errors caused by it are not significant for our purpose.
Even so, I personally try to stick to the area around 1000 ÂµS, and if necessary I dilute a sample of a strong nutrient solution 1:1 with RO water, just to do a reading.
B) Tap water also has a conductivity, and you need to measure it before using, so that you can subtract its value from your reading to arrive at your nutrients concentration. You can also try to incorporate the calcium content into your formulas, but then, you need to know what you are doing.

November 26, 2009 at 2:32AM
More Discussions
Does Algae Grow Under Artificial Light
Hi there. We all know that algae grow under sunlight....
brianivander
beginner needs help growing english ivy hydroponically
I'm doing a little experiment with growing English...
jentsu926
New hydro/soil hybrid garden. Multiple veggies, what should I feed?
Ok so I have a good handle on a pure hydro garden and...
Joe Mckee
Questions on passive hydro
Hello guys, I currently own a big sansevieria and want...
turbare
Need Aeroflo 36 in CA!
Looking for a lightly used aeroflo 36 in CA or willing...
nedgecomb
3.5-Qt. Straining Covered Saucepan
\$34.99 | zulily
Artisan Two-Thirds Size Baking Sheet
\$16.99 | zulily
Chef's Design Double Burner Reversible Grill/Griddle - Hard Coat Anodized - 3535
\$61.99 | Hayneedle
Cuisinart Green Gourmet Prep 12-piece Anodized Cookware
Overstock.com
Moooi | Heracleum II Small Pendant Light
YLighting
Sea Gull Lighting Lighting Kits Ambiance Antique Brushed Nickel Contemporary
\$30.42 | Home Depot
Tech Lighting | TECH Lighting MonoRail - 96 inch Length
\$140.80 | YLighting
Chef's Design Global Gold Griddle - 20 x 12 in. - 6375
\$49.49 | Hayneedle
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™