I won't even spoil the surprise. I'll just let you open the link.
Here is a link that might be useful: Completely out of the blue
OMG Bill is this for real?
I was waiting to see how many snide comments would come before I came back to laugh. Good one. LOL
I really doubt it. :-)
This article was originally published back in July on The Daily Rash, a satire site.
No, but Lindsey Lohan is endorsing him. That's makes three from Hollywood.
ok bill, the link won't work...who is it?
GGM you can do better than this.
Especially after posting this as the first response to Bill's post
Posted by greatgollymolly (My Page) on Sat, Oct 13, 12 at 20:50
OMG Bill is this for real?
How about the truth for a change. something like "I really believed this at first, until I did some investigating on my own. OOPS sometimes I am just too gullible."
It's really not that hard to do GGM. You should give the truth a try sometime.
Give it a break littleone. Do you plan to follow ggm from thread to thread attacking her every post? You have no clue what her thinking was when she made her first post. Sounded like to me she didn't believe it, but wasn't about to call bill a liar. You libs are able to call people liars so easily you can't imagine that not everyone does it.
Since the link only brings up "error," someone tell me what was there. That the NAACP was supporting Romney? I see in the sidebar that there is an article saying Oprah supports Romney. So which was it that we were supposed to see?
In either case, it was obviously a joke or a lie.
Interesting. I looked earlier this morning and the link opened. Now the article, suggesting that the NAACP was supporting Romney has been removed. Good! I'm sure that many found it offensive. Should be obvious to anyone that it was a lie. BUT, I'm sure that there are some that believe everything they read.
i am guessing it was probably removed because so many conservatives seem to think it was true. I have received messages from many of my right leaning 'friends' on Facebook stating that what was linked to here is indeed fact. (much like a lot of other cr*p that they feel necessary to share - when did my conservative pals become so gullible?).
maddielee - I think it was sometime in 2008 when someone told them Obama was a "socialist" and Muslim and that he wanted to bring this country DOWN.
Mrsj, little does does follow me around attacking me and you'll note I just ignore her like I would any pesky bug.
I thought Bill posted this as a joke and I never took it seriously. I didn't think the libs would take it so serously either but I forget they don't have a sense of humor unless they are listening to Bill Maher or reading the Huffington Post.
No one follows anyone around.
You post , people respond . That's how forums work. Are you suggesting that you don't want anyone to respond to your posts? If so why do you post?
Can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen
OH Please, I have better things to do in my life than follow you around on HT, GGM.
If it appears that way, well then, it must be the posts you are making, what you are saying that has anyone, including myself responding to what you say
You can ignore me all you want, doesn't bother me in the least.
If you post something that I want to respond to, comment on, agree with or disagree with, I will post on the thread or response to your post.
That's how this forum and all forums work.
If you don't want me or anyone else that would disagree with you to respond to your posts or threads that you post, then you should not be posting anything on this forum.
As chase said, "can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen."
I could care less that you disagree with me. I just hate to see you get so upset by my posts. I don't post them to upset you, they are my opinions and sometime it appears some of you take these posts way too seriously.
I don't agree with many of yours but I don't have a hissy fit over all of them and act like if I don't tell you what I think of them I'll lose my mind!!! Calm down, it's a damn forum for God's sake. Anyway, I'm skipping over most of them so I'm not even reading them. Save your fingers for something someone will read.
Maddielee...Not gullible, stupid.
OK, off topic, but what is with "I could care less" that has been typed by a couple people in the last week or so????
You do understand that means YOU COULD CARE LESS, right? That means you care, if only a little, or maybe a lot. Who knows.
I think the expression you want is I COULDN'T CARE LESS.
Meaning you COULD NOT CARE LESS. Therefore you do not care at all.
OK, rant over. Back to your regularly scheduled topic...
Jill, I've always had that same question. I've been corrected more times than I can count, saying I COULDN'T care less.
Bill - you mean they were telling you that you should be saying "could"??? If so, please explain the English language to them :-)