Study? What study?

david52 Zone 6November 1, 2012

"The author of a Congressional Research Service study, who found no evidence that tax cuts for high income earners lead to economic growth, is standing by his work, after the legislative branch's nonpartisan research arm withdrew the report under pressure from Republican leaders. And Democratic principals are demanding to know why CRS caved to GOP pressure.

CRS quietly and quickly pulled the six-week old report, despite the wishes of the research arm's economic team, the New York Times reported Thursday.

"I wasn't involved in the decision, as a matter of fact I was on vacation when the decision was made, so I can't really add anything to what was reported in the NY Times," Thomas Hungerford, the author of the study, told TPM in an email Thursday afternoon. "However, I certainly stand behind my work."

Rep. Sander Levin (D-MI) - the top tax writing Democrat in the House - wants CRS to answer for its decision.

"I was deeply disturbed to hear that Mr. Hungerford's report was taken down in response to political pressure from Congressional Republicans who had ideological objections to the report's factual findings and conclusion," Levin wrote in a letter (PDF) to CRS Director Mary Mazanec. "It would be completely inappropriate for CRS to censor one of its analysts simply because participants in the political process found his or her conclusion in conflict with their partisan position. I would like your explanation as to why this report was removed from the CRS website, who made that decision and what considerations led to it."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R-UT) voiced concerns with the study. McConnell's spokesman Don Stewart told the Times that his boss "raised concerns about the methodology and other flaws" and said CRS "decided, on their own, to pull the study pending further review." The Times reported that McConnell objected to CRS' use of the phrases "Bush tax cuts" and "tax cuts for the rich," noting their political connotations. Stewart didn't immediately respond to a request to elaborate on the concerns about the study's methodology.

Hatch's spokeswoman Antonia Ferrier told the Times, "There were a lot of problems with the report from a real, legitimate economic analysis perspective. We relayed them to C.R.S. It was a good discussion. We have a good, constructive relationship with them. Then it was pulled." She also didn't immediately return a request to elaborate.

Senate Democrats republished the report Thursday. One staffer accused Republicans of seeking to "censor" the study because it challenges their party's economic doctrine.

"This is a completely shocking attempt by the Republicans to censor a nonpartisan analysis because they didn't like the findings," a senior Democratic aide told TPM.

The study, which TPM and others reported on at the time, delved into the last 65 years of U.S. tax policy - specifically how marginal rates on high incomes and capital gains taxes impact decision-making. It concluded that reducing effective taxes on the rich does not generate economic growth, but that it does correlate with rising income inequality in the short term.

The report's conclusions aren't terribly controversial in mainstream economics. snip end quote

You mean, trickle down economics doesn't work? Shocked, I tell you, shocked.

Here is a link that might be useful: link

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jerzeegirl(9)

I think that congress has some nerve to commission a study and then to suppress it just because they don't like the conclusion. It's part of this new wave of dishonesty that is propelling republicans these days.

As citizens we should all be very angry that the republicans do not want to share this information with their constituents.

    Bookmark   November 1, 2012 at 10:35PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
marshallz10(z9-10 CA)

You just have to adopt the attitude that facts are fungible unlike petroleum, not the other way around.

    Bookmark   November 1, 2012 at 11:29PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jerzeegirl(9)

This is a really big deal. The central tenet of the republicans economic plan is malarkey! And then the republicans tried to hide the results from the American people (who paid for the report no doubt). Is this okay with you conservatives?

    Bookmark   November 2, 2012 at 8:14AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
esh_ga

Yes, I read this yesterday somewhere. Pathetic. I can't wait to see who gets voted out of office on Tuesday when it comes to Congressmen/women and Senators.

    Bookmark   November 2, 2012 at 8:16AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Relevant quotes II
I have noticed that some have referenced this thread...
don_socal
Earthquake prediction
There is a new study out for California that is impressive...
don_socal
Supremes Uphold Voter ID Law
The Supreme Court let stand a 7th Circuit Court ruling...
Christopher_H
Donald Trump to launch exploratory committee
because... "the only one who can make America...
duluthinbloomz4
Ban on Gay Marriage
Gov Steve Beshear (ky) came up with the most brilliant...
redsox_gw
Sponsored Products
Jonathan Charles Country Farmhouse Medium Walnut Hanging Shelf
$989.00 | LuxeDecor
Loloi Rugs Welbourne 7'7 Round Coffee & Beige Area Rug
$339.00 | LuxeDecor
Olive Branch Easel Frame - GOLD
$145.00 | Horchow
Mario Industries Splash Oblong Ceramic Mini Table Lamp - Coral - 10M238CO
$88.00 | Hayneedle
Antler Wrapped Votive Set
$119.99 | Dot & Bo
Block Snack Plate - SILVER
$65.00 | Horchow
Arcadia Lap Throw 50" x 70" - PEWTER/WHITE
$174.00 | Horchow
Woodard Tuscan Outdoor Swivel Dining Chair - Set of 2 - WD1514
$577.99 | Hayneedle
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™