JOIN NOW LOG IN
iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
Return to the Bees and Beekeeping Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Good bee article in New Yorker Magazine

Posted by idabean (My Page) on
Sat, Aug 4, 07 at 1:43

It is in this week's magazine. Judging from this forum, most experienced beekeepers know what's in this article. It manages to cover pretty concisely bee life, challenges and CCD. I hope some of you experienced folks might take a look at it and tell me what you think of it for accuracy. Remember, this is not a technical magazine, but a "literary" publication of fact, fiction, reviews and great cartoons for readers with high education and income levels.
Marie


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Good bee article in New Yorker Magazine

Marie, I read the article although I definitely don't fit the description of their general readers (especially the high income level) It seemed to be pretty accurate and well written as far as I could tell, but I'm far from being any kind of authority. There were a couple of things I didn't agree with. One was the statement that Italians bees are "laid-back but can have trouble producing enough honey for winter" I think any strain could have trouble producing enough in a really bad year. I had three Italian hives last year that started as 3 lb packages and each produced over 100 lbs of surplus honey besides what I left in each hive for overwintering, and they made it through the winter. The one Russian hive I have was very conservative with honey use through the winter. Also, seventy lbs of honey in one week is a lot for one hive. I averaged 80 lbs per hive total last year from 5 new packages and I thought that was exceptional since it came from those three hives and the other 2 didn't produce more than 10 or so lbs of surplus. I can't imagine hoisting a hive up on cables to keep it from the bears. I wonder how they keep it from tipping, especially if you start adding supers. An electric fence seems so much easier.


 o
RE: Good bee article in New Yorker Magazine

Tony,
Yeah, I had a hard time envisioning the bear-protection-program she resorted to, but it was a very funny image. We don't fit their profile either.I infer that profile of their readership by the cost of items they advertise. I don't know why I even mentioned that. Maybe I felt funny about saying "I read it in the New Yorker" the same way I sometimes feel strange about referencing the New York Times instead of USA Today.

Writing on these formums is really an act of trust, isn't it? We really know o little about the people we send our thoughts out to: we don't see what kind cars each other drives, or homes, not to mention other subtle indicators of income or class.

I think I was also wondering how a bee-keeping article by a staff writer of this magazine would sit with the ordinary beekeeper. So far, I have not a met a single gentleman or "gentlewoman" beekeeper.

Here's another reading recommendation: a slim novel called "The Final Solution" by MIchael Chabon. The protagonist is a very old, retired sleuth, who comes out of his private isolated world- which includes beekeeping- to solve one final case. You may recognize the book title as one of the last Sherlock Holmes story titles. There's a description there of him filling his briar pipe with a particularly noxious dark smokey tobacco, and exhaling into the hive to quiet the bees. It is priceless.Lots of good bee obervations, too, as literary and symbolic devices- I thought it was just neat to see bees "talked" about in a different perspective.

I feel the same way about this little thread, and other occasional ones: beekeeping as a spiritual experience.

So, Tonybeeguy, thanks for continuing to check in with us new 'uns, and giving me a chance to update you on this little love affair.


 o
RE: Good bee article in New Yorker Magazine

Can somebody please post link to the article. Thanks.


 o
RE: Good bee article in New Yorker Magazine

I re-read my post, and what was I thinking when I said "gentleman beekeeper"? Actually, I believe most of are like the "gentlemen farmers": raising bees not for a living but for the pleasure of it. I think I need to keep my vocabulary simple and less ambiguous; too many opportunities for mis-speaking!


 o
RE: Good bee article in New Yorker Magazine

This is where the article is. If you can't link to it, google newyorker.com. In the searcj box on the right hand side type "bees" and click search. below the search box will be "recent" in red and click on bees. It's written by Elizabeth Kolbert http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/06/070806fa_fact_kolbert

Here is a link that might be useful: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/06/070806fa_fact_kolbert


 
 

 

 


Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.



iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network