JOIN NOW LOG IN
iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
Return to the Botany Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Scientific nomenclature question

Posted by soeur z6b TN (My Page) on
Fri, Mar 3, 06 at 20:32

Today I saw an early Pieris flit by a blooming Pieris.

And this generates my query. The two Pieris mentioned are Pieris rapae, the cabbage white butterfly, and Pieris japonica, a member of Ericaceae sometimes called Andromeda.

How can two different lifeforms share a genus name? Do the botanical folks and the zoological folks not communicate about which names are used for what? It seems like there would be an overarching organization that kept track of such issues, but perhaps there isn't? Which, if so, seems like an incredible oversight to me.

It seems incredibly (and unscientifically) inexact to rely on context to distinguish which Pieris one is talking about.

Thanks for any insight into this. It's buggin' me!

Marty


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Scientific nomenclature question

Names only have to be unique within the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, and within the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature; it is permitted for a plant genus and an animal genus to share the same name.

There are plenty of other examples; two more well-known ones are Prunella (Dunnock, a bird, and Self-heal, a plant related to dead-nettle), and Oenanthe (Wheatear, a bird, and Hemlock Water-dropwort, a poisonous plant related to carrot).

Resin


 o
RE: Scientific nomenclature question

Thank you! Now I understand how dual names can exist. And I can't believe I never connected the dots between Prunellas before. I saw Dunnocks in Surrey when I visited there. Didn't know there was a botanical Oenanthe.

Not that my opinion counts one whit, but it still seems oddly inexact in such an exacting science as taxonomy to have parallel naming tracks like this.

Marty


 o
RE: Scientific nomenclature question

I guess it is felt that it is too much trouble to ask people naming new genera to have to avoid all published names in other kingdoms as well as the kingdon they're working in.

I seem to remember there are some single-celled organisms which have to have different names, depending on whether they are considered to be plants or animals.

Resin


 o
RE: Scientific nomenclature question-

BTW, it's always a nice question to put in quizzes - how do you distinguish between Prunella vulgaris and Prunella modularis? . . .


 o
RE: Scientific nomenclature question

Marty
You're like me .I always thought the binominal naming system was to be "exact" A single name for every living thing in a single language. Eliminating confusion .
I thought by reading the latin name I could eliminate all other specie let alone closely related genera by merely knowing a single language "Latin" i still think this was the original purpose but personality and politics got in the way.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if all names were discriptive and Latin not latinized??
Oh well,my two cents.
gary


 
 

 

 


Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.



iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network