Return to the Botany Forum | Post a Follow-Up

Not always what they seem

Posted by Peter60 Yorkshire UK (My Page) on
Sat, Oct 9, 04 at 9:29

While we can take the specific geographical epithet of most plants to be an accurate statement of their origins this is not always to be relied upon. There are many anomalies.
Scilla peruviana does not originate from Peru. The ship that brought it to the UK bore the name Peru and it was thought that is where the plants came from.
Prunus persica does not come from Persia but from China.
Our much grown Hibiscus syriacus is also from China and did not originate in Syria.
Many plants having the epithet 'indica' are not from India simply because when named much of Asia was accepted as India.
Azalea indica (Rhododendron indica) , long cultivated in Japan is native to China.
Its natural spread did not extend to the Indian sub-continent.
Lagerstroemia indica the Crepe Mytle originates from China.
The well known Kerria japonica is a native of China.
So while we are taking pride in learning our botanical names, perhaps we should be just a little questioning as to the accuracy of the geographical epithet that makes up the specific name of many.

My Website

Follow-Up Postings:

RE: Not always what they seem

  • Posted by weebus Z8 Sunset 5 WA (My Page) on
    Sun, Oct 10, 04 at 13:49

That sounds great, but what is the point if everyone still calls it Kerria japonica? I could take the endless hours fo doing research for what? So I can say, "But it is really from China and not Japan" and everyone around me says "Oh, OK...whatever."?

How about we get the genus properly identified first and then we work on the specific epitath?

RE: Not always what they seem

Or even worse, when they still call it a common name that gives no clue exactly what the plant is.
I get this one alot: "Do you have a firebush?" So far I have found that folks are referring to nandina dwarf firepower, burning bush, and firecracker vine. And who knows what other things they were talking about!!

This is probably going to be an issue with plants as long as there are humans involved in naming them...

RE: Not always what they seem

And it does not get any better when importers/growers run out of a variety, tag and relable similar plants wrongly, and pass them on as the 'real thing'.

 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!

Return to the Botany Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.

Learn more about in-text links on this page here