Return to the Bromeliad Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Posted by udo69 (My Page) on
Thu, Dec 31, 09 at 10:20

Hello All,

I don’t know what happened to my topic was lost. I have to post this again.

In middle of last year, I talked about crossing xQuesistrum’Claudia’ with unknown xNeomea (Maybe xNeomea exquisite) to create Quadrigeneric hybrids. There is only a few seedlings left. Here are 3 largest seedlings of the batch now show up the potential of Canistrum fosterianum the parent of xQues.’Claudia’ I had talked with Lisa about nothogenous of this hybrids. She said I’d have to create a new name using my last name. My last name is Chayangsu. This plant should name xChayangsuara.
The first has nice form and pattern of Canistrum fosterianum
Herexques.Claudia' x xNeomea
The second and third doesn’t show their potential.
xques.Claudia' x xNeomea
xques.Claudia' x xNeomea

At the same time, I also pollinated xQues.’Claudi’ with Ae.chantinii’Black’. Now I have about 20 seedlings. Most has dark scurfy foliages. For nothogenous, I'm thinking xQuesistrumea would be the easiest for a cross between xQuesistrum and Aechmea.
The first has very nice dark foliages with black spines. I love this one.
xques.Claudia' x ae.chantinii'Black'
The second and third are also nice.
xques.Claudia' x ae.chantinii'Black'
xques.Claudia' x ae.chantinii'Black'

I also crossed N.mooreana with Ae.chantinii’Black’. I think of stripe plant of Ae.chantinii with curly foliage of N.mooreana. Now seedlings start showing what I’m looking for. A lovely xNeomea.
xCanmea (N.mooreana x Ae.chantinii'Black')
xCanmea (N.mooreana x Ae.chantinii'Black')

Cheers
Yong


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

All very nice plants Yong.
My concern from the experimenting I have done would I be creating a weaker plant.


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Interesting stuff you have done there Yong.I like the real dark plant for colour, but the 2 plants with the chantinii 'Black' have it for shape ,and that cross being a primary hybrid should be vigerous , and you have shown that this type of breeding can be done as not all bigenerics are sterile ,but they often lose some of the features we wish to capture ,the fact that you use 2 spotted parents does not mean you will enhance the spots ( as Lisa stated as well ) but you have to keep us posted on what they grow up like and how the flower spikes look , Well done Mate ,
Jack


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Interesting crosses, Yong. You may be the first person to have achieved a quadrigeneric. Congratulations! The fact that the bigenerics were fertile may point to a closer relationship between the parent species than what their current taxonomic classifications would imply.

Of course, you'll want to wait for some clear indication that the cross actually took before registering them, and also hold them to the same standards as you would any monogeneric hybrid. A lot of the bigenerics in the registry are frankly rather ugly. They make for interesting mad scientist experiments, but most of them have limited commercial appeal. The trick is always to find parents that truly complement each other, regardless of what genus they are.

If the black chantinii was the pollen parent of the second bunch, then it certainly looks like that cross took. I agree the first dark seedling is very nice. You can see both parents in the N. mooreana cross too. Which one was seed parent of those? It's funny, Neos of that subgenus (Hylaeicum) don't seem to want to cross with the "regular" Neos at all. Maybe they are more closely related to Aechmeas?


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

I've made a lot of bigeneric crosses and the results are usually very dull. Everything just seems to average out so that you don't get any of the interesting features of either parent but instead you get only hints of features. That isn't always the case, but it happens a lot.

Lisa, I tried to cross N. pendula, a Hylaeaicum, with a few Aechmeas and nothing happened. I'll have to try some other genera next time I get the chance.


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Yeah, I tried Neo. pendula with Ae. recurvata, Nick, but I got no take. Also tried both of them with Orth. navioides. No luck there either. Too bad, those could have been interesting, and they have enough similar traits that I don't think they would have canceled each other out.


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Hell HDD,Jack, Lisa and Nick,

Thank for the comments.

HDD. I also have the same though. Bigeneric plant is weak. There is only some seeds got and a few seedlings can survive. It's hard to select the best plant from very few plant.

Jack. Everything could happen in our world. In my experience pollens from bigeneric plants are almost sterile but some pistil can except other pollens. The results are not so good. I think chantinii 'Black' is one of my fevorite plants in my breeding program.

Lisa. I have to wait and hold them until bloomed. Select only the best to register. I also think that bigeneric usually have no commercial value. How to fill the gap? In the second and third I used Ae.chantinii'Black' as a pollen plant. This was my first time to cross N.mooreana with other genera. I didn't expect the result. It was surprising about seedlings from the cross. I also tried to cross N.pendula x eleutheropetala with some Neo. The result was not so good. I have very seedling left and still very young to guess.

Nick.I always have fun to do the experiment and eager to see the result eventhough I get only hints. I think that we are like-minded. ;-)

Cheers
Yong


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

I don't think bigeneric plants are weak, per se, but you do end up with plants that just aren't going to make it. I guess you could say that you get a lot of birth defects as well as incompatible survival features.

This week I was again reading the Givinish article on DNA analysis of bromeliads and I realized just how far apart you can make crosses given that there are Dyckia and Hechtia crosses. It looks like it's been almost 14 million years since Dyckias and Hechtias had a common ancestor and yet you can still cross them.


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

I have a correction, I guess there really aren't any xDycktias so the next interesting cross would be the xPuckia or xPucohnia crosses which would be be something like 13 million years since a common ancestor.


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Hi Nick, that Gavinish article on bromeliad DNA sounds interesting. Is it available online anywhere? Or can you give me the reference details? Thanks, Paul


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

Hi again Nick, is this it? http://www.botany.wisc.edu/givnish/pdfs/Givnish Bromeliaceae.pdf

Cheers, Paul


 o
RE: Quadrigeneric, trigeneric and bigeneric again!!!

I have a print out and wasn't sure it was on the net but that looks to be it.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Bromeliad Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here