|
| To show thumbnails or simple images side by side you have to use html tags again.
1.
(table)
The example produces a frame of 2 rows, each beginning and ending with a tr (table row) tag, and 3 columns, each beginning and ending with a td (table data) tag. Keep in mind that the ending tags always begin with a slash. 2.
3.
4.
There are some other useful tags to design your text..
Frank
|
Follow-Up Postings:
|
|
- Posted by shrubs_n_bulbs z8/9 UK (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 12:03
| Denise, you seem to have scattering of BR tags inside your table. I imagine these are pushing the pictures down, although the usage is a little odd and they might show up differently in different browsers. Of course you don't actually need all those table tags top make your thumbnails come up in a row, they should do it automatically if the page is wide enough and provided you didn't put anything in between the thumbnail image tags that would break the line. From a purist standpoint, tables should be avoided except for displaying tabular data since it forces a layout which may be inappropriate for some viewers. Voila, no table (note: these thumbnails are just downsized versions of the real pics 'cos I'm too lazy to upload real thumbnails for this post!): P.S. Its also worth noting that the latest GardenWeb page layout is completely within a table, hence some of the alignment issues, just one of many things that have been completely butchered recently and would be very annoying if I wasn't using an advanced browser that de-butchers them for me ;) |
|
- Posted by www_euphorbia_de Germany (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 13:05
| Shrubs_n_bulbs, this doesn’t seem to work for me. The way I used to use tags for thumbnails and images is as follows. (a href="http://url_for_image1.jpg")(img src="http://url_for_thumbnail1.jpg")(/a) They then appear one below the other and never side by side. Frank |
|
- Posted by shrubs_n_bulbs z8/9 UK (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 14:06
| Frank, I suspect you are putting each image on a separate line in the HTML, so they come out on a separate line in the browser. A tiny thing, but it makes a big difference. I'll try to show what I mean with your example, but I think it will make the screen ugly! |
|
- Posted by Paracelsus (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 14:35
| I think I got it. Thanks to Frank for starting the discussion and to shrubs for explaining why Franks brilliant table solution is unecessary if you just get rid of unecessary space! Tinkering showed a strategic space in between image links adds a nice white border between images. Thanks to Both of you! |
|
- Posted by RosemarieRo z11/24 So Calif (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 15:08
| Thanks Frank & SnB! I'm also going to save/print out these instructions. I've been posting tables over on the Garden Photo Gallery (using (center) additionally) & any steps eliminated is good by me! I haven't been using thumbnails here, because some can't view them, for whatever reason. Glad you started this thread, Frank! |
|
| Frank, you wrote: In order not to confuse the Gardenweb’s computer software I had to change You can use the extended character set to depict the tag enclosures as follows: < = < Thus ..... <table> Brackets are too confusing. BTW, these depictions are functions of HTML rather than the Board software which is based on HTML 4.0. As S&B points out, the Table element is not necessary for horizontal image layout -- it is Browser dependent in any case. James |
|
| I'm not computer literate at all and the directions, while very clear to others looks like Chinese arithmetic to me. I thought I would NEVER figure out how to post pics at all!! :-) Is there any reason that I should post my pics as thumbnails rather than full size? Bill in SC |
|
- Posted by Jeffrey_harris San Diego, CA (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 17:25
| Being the HTML neanderthal (and my apologies to all HTML-savvy Neanderthals out there), I am afarind I don't follow this at all. Perhaps if I printed it and studied what you've written for say, an epoch, I might get it, but what I am reading doesn't yet 'click here' in my head.' I hesitate to ask you to put it another way, just so that Ican understand what you're writing - you've all gone to a lot of work as it is. Is there a way of seeing the code behind the pictures? Perhaps if I see that, combined with what Frank, SnB and James have written, the code will become understandable to me. |
|
- Posted by Jeffrey_harris San Diego, CA (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 17:35
| Hi Bill, I think I know that one - if you have a slow connection, and the picture is large, it will take a long time to load. Using thumbnails prevents that. |
|
| Jeffrey:
Here is the HTML code behind the above picture: <img src="http://jp29.org/dihors14.JPG"> ..... the HTML element tag that designates image retrieval and display (img src) and the URL (Uniform Resource Location) address for the image (domain name on my server = jp29.org) James |
|
- Posted by Jeffrey_harris San Diego, CA (My Page) on Tue, Nov 1, 05 at 18:20
| Dear James, Thank you, but I should have been more specific; how do I see the code for the laterally -arranged pictures above? Or, perhaps better, do yuou know of a website that would learn me such information as to how to post pictures in such a manner as Denise and Frank did? Thanks much! |
|
| Yes Jeffrey, my dial up is slow, but the idea is to post pics on the lowest camera setting for ease of loading and viewing on the forum. In fact, the forum won't accept a pic if it is too large. Even with my slow dial up, properly sized pics pop right up for me. Mine are formated like the way James just illustrated.. Bill in SC |
|
| Jeffrey and Bill: The following illustrates the horizontal layout of three clickable image thumbnails. As you can see, you do not have to use the HTML table element to effect this. I have repeated just one image to simplify this demonstration. You can cut and paste the HTML code that produced this image layout (below) and substitute your own URLs/images. <a href="http://jp29.org/disubv01.JPG"><img src="http://jp29.org/head01.JPG"></a> <a href="http://jp29.org/disubv01.JPG"><img src="http://jp29.org/head01.JPG"></a> <a href="http://jp29.org/disubv01.JPG"><img src="http://jp29.org/head01.JPG"></a> Glossary of terms used in above code: HTML -- Hyper Text Markup Language and ..... URL -- Uniform Resource Location: the internet address at which the requested image can be found. Please visit my Home page where you will find clickable links to basic online HTML references/resources. James |
|
| Jeff, My pic site is offering the "tags" (right word??) for thumbnails. Otherwise, I would have never gotten it! Does your pic site do so? The first time I did it, I used the "tag" that makes a full-sized picture. So I ended up with 3 big pics side-by-side. Then I realized my pic site had "thumbnail tags." Tried that and, voila!... worked like a charm! Denise in Omaha |
|
|
| Sorry, everyone, I didn't take into account the long line wrap of the first posting when I composed the above -- it's getting late! James |
|
| Hi All, just a comment: this is surely appreciable, but noone on earth still writes html code that way. Because even knowing the html, it's so easy to make mistakes and soooo annoying... There are programs that write html for you while you just drag&drop the objects on the screen. Some forums I have seen give you the possibility of customizing the text you're entering writing some html on your behalf. This is not the case of GW: IMHO the essential look of GW makes it more "professional". Anyway, for the curious people using Internet Explorer: if you want to know how a page has been written, just click on View->source and look for the piece of text of interest. Have a good time! :) Alessandro |
|
- Posted by shrubs_n_bulbs z8/9 UK (My Page) on Wed, Nov 2, 05 at 5:30
| Even better, select the bit of the page you are interested in, right click, and click on view selection source (don't think you can do this in IE, get a real browser!). |
|
| Allesandro wrote: just a comment: this is surely appreciable, but noone on earth still writes html code that way ..... No, that is not so, Allesandro, in fact most Web authors who are dedicated to producing interoperable pages -- those that will render in all user agents -- use text editors to hand code HTML Markup. Automatic code generators ("canned" Web page software) frequently employ non-standard propriety HTML Markup that may render correctly in the more popular graphical Browsers, but not in other rendering agents. Although these software packages are getting better at generating interoperable pages, most still fall short, not even providing alternate text for images (as we are not doing here) thus violating the requirements of accessibility for people with disabilities. While the majority of Rendering Agents used on the Internet are Graphical Browsers that display text and images (such as MSIE, FireFox, Opera, et al), Textual Browsers that only display text and Screen Readers that read pages from left to right -- top to bottom -- and render the text as synthesized speech are also frequently employed, particularly by People with Disabilities. The major premise of the principle of Interoperability, as advanced by the W3C, is that Web pages which contain valid HTML markup -- measured against established standards -- will function satisfactorily in all Rendering Agents. Conversely, pages that contain invalid HTML Markup with propriety tags and constructs (tag soup) -- will only function reliably in Rendering Agents designed to accommodate those tags and constructs. To get an idea of just how many Graphical Browsers alone (therefor excluding Text Browsers and Screen Readers) are currently used on the WWW visit ..... ..... standards complying Markup is essential to insure correct rendering in all of them, i.e. Interoperability. The most frequently used method of checking HTML Markup for standards compliance/Web page Interoperability is to use a reliable Validator such as ..... ..... most extant Web pages, composed using non-standard automatically generated Markup, will fail Validation (not interoperable). Test this GW page -- or your own -- just out of curiosity. Pages that pass Validation are interoperable (will render correctly in ALL devices) and garner accolades for the author! James
|
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Cacti Gallery Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.





