Shop Products
Houzz Logo Print
conifer50

Pinus coulteri.......

conifer50
12 years ago

....cones from Jackson County, Oregon....this being the most northernly known native outlier/disjunct population.

Johnny

{{gwi:634213}}

Comments (15)

  • monkeytreeboy15
    12 years ago

    I was not aware that there was a population in Oregon! Thanks for sharing these cones.

    -Sam

  • pinetree30
    12 years ago

    Sabiniana.

  • conifer50
    Original Author
    12 years ago

    Right on Ronald!...Lots of fog in North Georgia today..Big Cones, Big Mistakes, and it's Monday...that one is inexcusable.

    Thanks,

    Johnny

  • conifer50
    Original Author
    12 years ago

    Here's a reference article on "Pinus sabiniana" in Oregon.

    Johnny

    Here is a link that might be useful: Discovering Gray Pine in Oregon

  • pineresin
    12 years ago

    Nice, but the Pinus sabiniana in Oregon are all planted by people, or naturalised regeneration from planted trees; it isn't genuinely native in Oregon (despite what the article claims!).

    Resin

  • greenlarry
    12 years ago

    Lovely cones!

  • shastensis
    12 years ago

    Just last week I visited an excellent stand of this species, with some of the largest I have seen, some approaching 100 feet, probably. It is located on the east slopes of Mt. Hamilton, just a mile from the Mt. Hamilton observatory, at elevations of about 4000 ft. It grows with Pinus ponderosa and Quercus kelloggii. Mt. Hamilton is about 20 miles east of San Jose, but it is a good 40 minute drive due to a steep and winding road. Lots of Golden Eagles up there, too. Some of the cones I measured at nearly 20 inches in length.

  • botann
    12 years ago

    Here's a picture of Pinus coulteri cones I gathered near Coulterville last Fall. Evan got some seeds a few months later as they opened.
    Mike....watching it rain.

    {{gwi:634214}}

  • Embothrium
    12 years ago

    This and P. ponderosa seem to be having a nasty needle cast problem around here in recent years, maybe it's the weather. P. jeffreyi appears largely or entirely unaffected.

  • conifer50
    Original Author
    12 years ago

    Hi Mike,.....The cones from Coulterville/Mariposa County CA are Grey Pine/Digger Pine/Pinus sabiniana. As a rule, this eco-type from the Sierra Nevada region has much smaller cones than coastal and Klamath Mtns varities.

    Johnny

  • botann
    12 years ago

    Thanks Johnny.
    The pines were pretty grey. Since I found them near Coulterville I assumed they were P. coulteri.
    Wrong again!
    Mike

  • pineresin
    12 years ago

    Couple of clues:

    Cones reddish-toned: P. sabiniana
    Cones yellow-buff: P. coulteri

    Seed longer than seedwing: P. sabiniana
    Seed shorter than seedwing: P. coulteri

    Resin

  • Embothrium
    12 years ago

    The two trees are also quite different in aspect, Coulter pine producing large tufts of thick looking foliage (and large massive cones) and gray pine looking like a cloud of smoke.

  • georgeinbandonoregon
    12 years ago

    concerning the "native" or "non native" status of pinus sabiniana in southern oregon---thee are other examples of taxa typically regarded as endemic to california in that area including juglans hindsii, cercis occidentalis, aesculus californica, etc. that are apparently growing natively in isolated parts of the rogue valley area of southern oregon. the plants are growing in uncultivated/non roadside areas apparently not associated with either native american or euro-american settlements. certainly other elements of the largely californian chaparrel formation are also native in the area including arctostaphylos, ceanothus, garrya, cercocarpus, etc. local experts like frank callahan seem to believe that the plants are true relicts of a more extensive "california type" flora that has been restricted by cooler temps and further reduced by recent human activities. you can probably find his article on pinus sabiniana for the oregon native plant society by googling his name, "pinus sabiniana", and "rogue valley, oregon".

  • nothotsuga
    12 years ago

    Of course not along the roadside. Otherwise they would have been spotted a long time ago. But there is a pattern as if someone wanted to make nonnative native. It would be quite useful commercially, isn't it? Curiously no old trees, never. The old trees are supposed to have been logged or burned. Even in these cases, no proof. Trees after a fire for instance leave part of trunks. Where are they? Where are the stumps and roots left for molecular analysis? Where is the peer review? Where is the material available for independant analysis?

    Is it bad luck when a survey was done for one area and no Californian endemic was found? But after a fire, miracle: regeneration of a Californian endemic!

0