Return to the Conifers Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

Posted by ken_adrian z5 (My Page) on
Sat, Apr 14, 12 at 18:27

mine is going on 10 feet or more..

and it is losing most of its coloration.. other than green ...

it is also being near totally shaded.. due to its neighbors.. as they all mature together ... there is no way to get it in more sun ...

is it common for it to lose color with advanced age ???? .. or is most likely a sun issue???

should i move on with life.. and remove it... its simply pretty ugly.. w/o the coloration ...

google brings up a fincham pic.. rather nicely marked.. in full sun ...

ken

ps: if i were to try rooting some.. and i took only green tissue.. would the white show later.. or would it be a waste of time.. and i should only do pieces with white there

Here is a link that might be useful: link


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

Ken, first of all it's Cupressus nootkatensis now instead of Chamaecyparis nootkatensis.

Second, you mentioned a white variegation on your plant so 'Aureovariegated' is never possible, your's is a 'Variegata' like the one at Bob's pic.

Third, 'Aureovariegated' is never possible because written this way it will be partly Latin and partly English which is illegitimate'.
'Aureovariegata' is the cultivar name which is correct for the yellow variegated form.

The problem with the 'Variegata' is that it will produce green branches regulary, also known as reversions.
These have to be cut off otherwise they will take over the slower growing variegated parts and an ugly specimen will appaer.

If I were you I would get rit of your ugly specimen, but remember that you're the cause that it became ugly because you didn't cut off the green branches in time.

Use only the white variegated parts for propagation.
By using green parts a green specimen will appaer, better known as the species Cupressus nootkatensis...


 o
RE: Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

soooo

back to the gist of my post...

is it common for it to lose color with advanced age ???? .. or is most likely a sun issue???

to which i will add.. does anyone grow it ... and/or have a picture to share

is there any other large specimen in the world.. other than the fincham pic

if it were in full sun .... besides burning off all the variegation here in a MI winter ... would it be a better specimen ...

and that really is the key ... every z5 winter it burns off the white/yellow ... so in theory.. every spring.. under the above logic. .. i would be deadheading the entire tree ... [which would have .. of course.. solved the issue long ago.. lol]

so the issue is.. would it.. get more sustained color.. in sun ... regardless of winter...

i guess what i am getting at.. is whether it is even worth rooting more ...

ken

ps: my hunch is that this is a very old cultivar.. which has fallen from the trade.. due to its failure to perform to expectations ... in other words.. its an oldie.. but perhaps not a goody ... [the latin name is a good indicator of its oldiness]


 o
RE: Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

Should be the same as anything else, including hostas. Sun will intensify variegated color while possibly burning it.
From what I can read, the yellow color is only intense on new growth, while older growth gets more greenish. So an older tree will be greener overall?

On the one hand the tree will grow somewhat in light shade, so unless you've got something better for that spot, why not leave it there.
On the other hand it may not be worth the bother. Not many good pictures out there, probably for a reason. You can always experiment.


 o
RE: Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

Ken, Ours is probably about the size of yours and is really nice this spring. We had a Z6 winter in Indy with no snow(so no reflective sunlight)and the ground was only frozen a couple of inches(root uptake all winter). Usually the yellow is brown by spring. 2 Joy, If you took cuttings from the green would'nt they be the same as the cultivar that mutated the yellow originally? Jay


 o
RE: Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

Not sure about this cultivar, but I have two Cham. obtusa 'Crippsii' and sun definately determines the degree of gold on them. More sun, more gold.

tj


 o
RE: Chamaecyparis nootkatensis 'Aureovariegated'

Jay, if you take cuttings of the green parts the green colour will remain without any variegation.
The green one isn't a cultivar but the species Cupressus nootkatensis.
Btw, the variegation of this one isn't yellow but white...


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Conifers Forum

Instructions

  • You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
  • HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
  • No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.



 
Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.