Lodgepole pine?

definitely *not* Lodgepole Pine, Pinus contorta var. latifolia. This tree is way more massive, needles much longer and cones much larger and longer.

Looks like Jeffrey pine to me.

Pinus jeffreyi is also one of my top choices. It's kind of out of place on the dry side of the North Cascades, wouldn't you say? Good guess, Ron. Let's see if Mr Resin checks in soon.

The cones look like inmature Ponderosa cones to me. They just aren't ripe yet.
Mike

Hi Mike; to me they seem to be too long for immature ponderosa cones. They were 8" (20cm) long which is much larger than any Pinus ponderosa cone. Tree-wise Pinus jeffreyi is very similar to ponderosa. I just haven't seen enough wild jeffreyis to be able to make a positive id myself.

Yeah, 8 inches is too long for a Ponderosa cone.
Mike

Pinus jeffreyi for me also.

It looks to be in a residential neighborhood, so it could have been brought up from California?

-Sam

Definitely Pinus jeffreyi

Resin

thanks for the confirmation! The question that bears asking now is how these (relatively) old trees got so far from home. Sam, they're not in a neighborhood, but seemingly planted on the grounds of the Sun Mountain Lodge in Winthrop many years ago. Personally, I'm happy to see that they're so happy so far from their native range.

~Dave

There are numbers of planted examples in WA, I see the species all the time. In Seattle it is known over 93' tall, at least a few locations elsewhere in the state have even taller ones.

Jeffrey Pine is common here, and resembles Ponderosa Pine, but is darker in all respects, denser, stouter, with larger cones and needles

--A.L. Jacobson, Trees of Seattle - Second Edition (2006)