Here is another picture of the tree. Thanks :)

Araucaria mulleri

I don't think it is an Araucaria at all. Definitely not araucana and doesn't look like muelleri to me either.

Very interesting, strange tree.
I think it's an Araucaria but definitly not araucana. It's not easy to find it out, because a lot of Araucarias have very similar ( young and ) adult needles.
Next week I will get back my book about Araucarias. Maybe there is an answer.

Wolfgang

Looks like it may need a permanent support. If it were mine I would also inspect the two trunks that appear to be wrapped around one another, with a view toward possibly cutting one of them off.

LEAVES ON ARAUCARIA ARAUCANAS GO UPWARD OR POINT UP TOWARD THE END OF THE BRANCH.

JEEZ, FROM THE BARK, SIZE AND SHAPE IT LOOKS LIKE IT COULD BE AN ACACIA ?

Thanks everyone :)

Wolfgang, I shall eagerly await an update from you.

Meanwhile I'll take some better pictures of the tree, leaves and trunk and post it here.

Novice Gardener
Victoria aka Garden State.

I have an Araucaria muelleri and it is totally different. The branching structure, foliage and bark are not Araucaria-like. Better photos will confirm that this is something else.

Here is a close up view of the top of the leaf. I've taken lots of pictures and attached a link below. Hopefully this should make it easier for you to tell me what it is. The leaves smells lovely when crushed.

Here is a link that might be useful: link to more photos

Melaleuca diosmifolia or similar species.

Thank you very much bboy!

Salicaceae is right. No conifer!

Good to see the details.

Good eye!!Compliment!

Wolfgang

And the winner is................. bboy.

Melaleuca diosmifolia (Myrtaceae) it is!