JOIN NOW LOG IN
iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
Return to the Going Green Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Counter top material

Posted by mimsic NYC (My Page) on
Sun, Jan 28, 07 at 11:32

Has anyone actually used Richlite, Paperstone or Plyboo for counter tops in the kitchen?


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Counter top material

Search in the Kitchens forum -- lots of people have either used or examined those countertop materials. Lots of good reading there, and people who can ask questions you may have afterward.


 o
RE: Counter top material

I went to Bettencourt in Brooklyn last week and got samples and good info on the paperstone, etc. Paperstone seems like the best of these products. Plyboo is good looking but it requires more maintainence than I am likely to give it. Richlite may not be as durable, is more likely to show scratches and is not 100% recycled. The Paperstone is indeed quite nice looking, although not as dramatic as granite. My contractor is intrigued and the cost is about $40 a square foot. I have found a slab of graite that I like and it is certainly long lasting and emissions-free, therefore considered a good choice by the green-buildings crowd. The granite and Paperstone come long distances to get to Brooklyn so the 2 seem to balance each other out. I love the idea of recycled materials but my ultimate decision will be based on 2 things, the price and taste.


 o
RE: Counter top material

Granite comes long distances, and it seems unsustainable, so I'm interested to hear it's considered a more green material.

What other materials are relatively green for counters?


 o
RE: Counter top material

  • Posted by bry84 England (My Page) on
    Sat, Mar 24, 07 at 13:59

Granite isn't the most environmentally sustainable material, it has very high embodied energy and mining is generally bad for the environment.

Increasing demand has made the mining industry move away from more traditional methods towards extensive large scale projects. Whole mountains are now being routinely reduced to stumps to feed our demand for minerals (mostly coal). We often forget to consider the environment being removed to access the minerals. For example, in the case of aluminium it's often tropical rain forest. Mining has not gathered as much attention as other environmental issues, but it's going to be a major problem in the future. The increasing scale of it is making the supply cheaper and the demand greater, but we're exhausting the world's supply of many minerals (phosphates, for example), it just hasn't gathered the same attention as depleting fossil fuels. Regarding most minerals, people are still in the "endless resources" bubble that was similar to public views on fossil fuels not so long ago. There's so much still in the ground we just assume there will always be another lump to extract and consume - but what we all forget is just how many people are thinking that and planning to do exactly that every day for the rest of their lives.

These reasons are why it concerns me that so many minerals and mineral based products are finding their way on to lists of ecological products, when impartial comparisons show that oil/plastic based alternatives normally consume much less energy, less resources and less land. The full life cycle does have an impact, but high quality plastics (for example kitchen laminates) can last a very long time, perhaps even longer than natural materials. My formica kitchen is from the 1940s and is still glossy, hygienic and easy to clean.

Unfortunately, many kitchens will come to an early end regardless what they're made from, either because low quality materials were used or fashion changed. Avoid these two common pitfalls and I'm sure whatever you choose will be a good choice, but do consider plastics fairly, they actually have very strong environmental credentials when used for long lasting materials such as building materials and furniture.


 o
RE: Counter top material

These reasons are why it concerns me that so many minerals and mineral based products are finding their way on to lists of ecological products

Finally, someone else who "gets it"! So many people on this board (not in this forum, of course) tout granite countertops and stone flooring as "natural" and "green" and give plastic anything (laminate countertops, vinyl flooring) the ol' hairy eyeball for being made of that demon petroleum. In fact, pretty much anything you put on a floor or countertop has to be "harvested" from somewhere. But, for some reason, the process of excavating granite or marble (usually by workers who do not get the best of the deal), transporting this heavy material, finishing it (using who-knows-how-much water and solvents), and transporting it again to its final resting place (your kitchen) doesn't enter into the declaration of how "natural" and "green" it is.

I just saw an article which stated that the nickel used in Toyota's Prius' batteries travels from Canada (where it is mined), to Europe (where it is refined), to China (where it made into "nickel foam" for the batteries), to Japan (for installation in the car (which is then shipped here). How many miles must one drive a Prius to make up for that many trips across that many oceans? And what happens when that battery is no longer usable?

Just by living on this planet, we consume resources of one kind or another. Minimal consumption is best, but the determination of "minimal" must include everything it takes to make that consumption possible, not just the end product.


 o
RE: Counter top material

I have a hard time chastising Prius owners because their batteries traveled a long distance before making it to their driveways. While I agree we should consider the total life cycle of products we consider, I think the best most of us can do is make consumer decisions that are better than others out there. And the last thing we should be doing is discouraging people from buying a Prius because it's not a "perfect" solution. There are plenty of environmental hogs driving Hummers and the like who do relatively more damage than those Prius drivers.

The same analogy can be applied to countertops. I live in New England and just finished a kitchen and mudroom remodel. We chose granite counters sourced from Canada and slate tile sourced from Vermont to support local businesses and to minimize the environmental impact of long distance transport of materials. I'm satisfied that we met our environmental objectives with choices that are both beautiful and long lasting.


 o
RE: Counter top material

Not to -- um, drive -- too far off-topic here, but my Prius comment was intended to point out that the entire lifecycle of a product must be evaluated against the other choices. I have to wonder if the Prius would be the darling of the "green scene" if the carbon footprint of its production were compared to those of, say, a small modern European turbodiesel or even miserly gasoline-powered vehicles like the Chevy Aveo or Toyota Corolla. Do the reduced CO2 emissions of and consumer's gasoline usage for a Prius compensate for the battery's three trips across oceans and a special challenge come recycling/disposal time when "normal" vehicles using existing infrastructure approach the fuel mileage and emissions levels? Driving a Prius may be better for the environment than driving a Hummer, but would driving a Toyota Corolla or Ford Focus be even better in terms of overall carbon footprint?


 o
RE: Counter top material

Back to the original topic at hand: countertop materials. :-)

What are your thoughts on concrete countertops? I've been researching them and they look kinda cool. Depending on the choice of color and finish, some of them look like soapstone.

We're thinking about using concrete in our kitchen project, mostly because of cost. My husband will likely do them himself. Any idea how feasible this is?

Here is a link that might be useful: kitchen plans


 o
RE: Counter top material

The Cheng site discusses DIY concrete countertops in some detail. I've seen it referred to as a good resource in several locations.

Here is a link that might be useful: Cheng concrete countertop site


 o
RE: Counter top material

Hi all,
My husbabnd has a residential remodeling company and we have installed both richlite and concrete -- both definitely have their romance, but in my opinion the richlite (or whatever brand of compressed paper solid surface you choose, I have heard that richlite is not the "greenest") feels really nice both in a tactile and acoustic sense. Somehow the warmth of wood comes through. The color of the richlite will change or patina over time and it can scratch more easily than other solid surfaces.
The Cheng books are really great if you are going towards concrete. They are full of inspiring examples. I especially love the idea of the built in drain board.
One word of caution if using pigments with concrete is to be open to pleasant surprises rather than fixed on a certain outcome. There is some crazy science in there!
In either case there have been no complaints in the past three years regarding scratching or staining to either surface. Hope that helps.
-Ellen


 o
RE: Counter top material

Just wondering, what waterproofs the concrete?


 o
RE: Counter top material

You may want to check this comprehensive marble countertop, granite countertop etc

Here is a link that might be useful: Granite Countertop Marble Countertop


 o
RE: Counter top material

I bought the granite countertop and satisfied

Here is a link that might be useful: Countertops


 o
RE: Counter top material

Reclaimed Wood is the greenest material in my book. Check out www.solumreclaimed.com for a unique take on countertops.

Here is a link that might be useful: Solum


 o
RE: Counter top material

Clearly recycled or reclaimed materials are the more environment friendly options, but the fact remains, that they simple do are not as good (in every sense of aesthetics & Function) as natural materials, i.e. natural stone. If you're comfortable with plastic looking countertops, go recycled, and if you still require the look and strength of natural stone, at least choose the less of all available evils. By far the most eco-friendly natural stone is Soapstone. 2 reasons, 1) Soapstone comes from boulder quarries which are substantially smaller, easier to quarry and have a much less dramatic effect on the terrain. 2) no chemical sealer is required. The only substance that is applied, is Mineral oil. Safe, non toxic & non - VOC emmitting liquid. Go ahead, look it up.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Going Green Forum
 
 


iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network