Return to the Hot Topics Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
King Ricard III

Posted by Bothell none (My Page) on
Tue, Feb 5, 13 at 1:04

His remains have been found and a DNA match and other forensic evidence confirms it is him. I am very interested in English history and think he was maligned by Shakespeare and Tudor historians. The saying goes that history is written by the winners. Henry VII who defeated Richard III had a much less valid claim to the throne and a mother from h-e-l-l who both did some very unsavory things to get and keep the throne. Henry or more likely his mother were probably responsible for the deaths of the princes in the tower. If we think politics are rough now, read up on the plotting, murdering & mayhem that went on back then.


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: King Ricard III

Have you ever read the Book Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey it's quite entertaining? A detective novel that investigates Richard the III.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

that is a very big jump Bothell that henry or Mumsie were responsible for the princes' deaths


 o
RE: King Ricard III

Let' s not pick on my ancestors...


 o
RE: King Ricard III

I think it's amazing that they found him under a parking deck ....


 o
RE: King Ricard III

My kingdom for a parking space...

Fascinating that such an historical figure has been found and identified.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

First parking deck to be turned into a national shrine, I am sure.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

What I haven't figured out is how they pinpointed the grave. They didn't have to dig up that much of the parking lot to find him.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

  • Posted by ohiomom 3rdrockfromthesun (My Page) on
    Tue, Feb 5, 13 at 12:44

I have actually been following the story on this discovery, yeah call me a nerd, and they knew where the old Greyfriar Monastery was and apparently they knew what they were looking for ... a stone marking where the choir section was where only "people of importance" would have been buried. So I think they knew where to dig and yes I think it is fascinating that they found the remains of Richard.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

  • Posted by bboy USDA 8 Sunset 5 WA (My Page) on
    Tue, Feb 5, 13 at 12:50

This was on the radio yesterday, a guy wrote a book about it and is promoting it.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

From the BBC News Magazine (Sept 2012) -- Richard III: The people who want everyone to like the infamous king

Richard III only ruled England for two years, but it is his alleged role in the disappearance of his young nephews - the "princes in the tower" - that made him infamous.

Many historians say he remains a likely candidate for their murder, but the Richard III Society believes that Tudor propaganda is to blame for his negative image.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

Nice to know 'spin' isn't something new -- and can be 're-spun' over centuries. Who can claim to know 'the truth'? it's just what's *believed* at any given time.

I have to give some credit to a guy who can sell himself to the widow of the man he's just murdered! Shakespeare -- or that other guy LOL LOL -- at his twisted best.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

I find it completely interesting DNA evidence is what confirmed the result. That his sister's descendents were the ones they could identify their DNA with his. Really? Amazing that the lineage is still intact. Take him for instance:

"Succession

Richard and Anne had one son, born in 1473, Edward of Middleham, who died (April 1484) not long after being created Prince of Wales. Richard also had two acknowledged illegitimate children: John of Gloucester, also known as "John of Pontefract", and a daughter Katherine who married William Herbert, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, in 1484. Michael Hicks and Josephine Wilkinson have suggested that Katharine's mother may have been Katherine Haute, on the basis of the grant of an annual payment of 100 shillings made to her in 1477."

Here is a link that might be useful: wiki, but it still shows what I mean


 o
RE: King Ricard III

Interesting reconstruction of the head/face of the king based on the skull recovered in the excavation. He doesn't look like a villain.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

I have actually been following the story on this discovery, yeah call me a nerd

Ditto OM. I'm in the nerd club with you. I love archeology and history and this has fascinated me since I first heard about it.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

I love this stuff. fascinating...
I am not sure how Richard can be exonerated since he did usurp his nephew's crown and have him declared illigetimate-by act of parliament- so hard to get around that. Since the York line was so far down in the sucession-it should have been the Mortimers descendents of Edward III's second son Lionel Duke of Clarence and you also have to skip over the Lancasters decendents of the 3rd son. Picky picky I suppose.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

Hi history geeks! I didn't mean to abandon this - it's so interesting, but for whatever reason I had no remote access today. Back to our story. Richard assumed his brother, Edward's throne after it was determined that Edward's marriage may not have been legal & under the laws of the time, his sons, deemed illegitimate, could not succeed him after his death. Whether this was at Richard's doing or not, he was crowned King. The 2 princes were lodged in the Tower of London, which was not only a prison/dungeon but also a royal residence where they were kept. Meanwhile, Henry's mother, Margaret had been working on her son's behalf trying to put forward his claim to the throne. He hadn't been in England since he was a child and she was raising arms/support on his behalf. She, at one point, was under house arrest (because of her plotting) and her husband, Lord Stanley, was to keep charge of her. She had arranged for her son, Henry, to be betrothed to the sister of the princes, Elizabeth of York. If her plotting was successful and Henry became king, do you think he'd want 2 princes with better claims than his alive & laying claim to the throne? So the princes vanished, quite probably by murders arranged by Margaret, to help her son's claim. Oh one more thing, at the Battle of Bosworth, Richard was abandoned by Lord Stanley & his troops. So, who had the most to gain from the deaths of the princes? By the way, Henry did marry Elizabeth and by some accounts, her life was made miserable by that harpy, her mother-in-law, Margaret. End of our tale!


 o
RE: King Ricard III

Labrea: sorry, I wasn't ignoring your book suggestion. No, I haven't read Daughter of Time, but as I've had it suggested from several different sources in the past 2 days, it's now on my Kindle & I'm looking forward to reading it.

Young Quinn: Hope I've answered your question about why I'm picking on Henry & Mumsy aka the Harpy.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

another rave review of 'Daughter of Time';
I read it years ago & loved it.


 o
RE: King Ricard III

Bothell-David Hume makes interesting reading on all this stuff and he would not agree with your assesment things especially in view of the fact that Margaret Beauford supposedly arranged for the marriage of her son Henry in collusion with Elizabeth Woodville mother of the bride(Elizabeth of York) and also mother of the murdered boys, that this was in the works while Richard was king so Elizabeth W. was coluding with the Lancasters. Why would Elizabeth Woodville agree to the marriage of her daughter to the man who had her sons murdered? She was as redoubtable a force in her own right as Margaret B.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Hot Topics Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here