Return to the Hot Topics Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Happy Birthday

Posted by david52 z5CO (My Page) on
Sat, Oct 15, 11 at 11:20

"ON 31 October, a newborn baby somewhere in the world will become the 7 billionth member of the human race. Or so says the UN - alternatively, this date could be at least a year too early.

Behind the UN's patina of certainty may lie outdated and unreliable census data. The suspicion is that millions of births and deaths have not been counted and there is huge uncertainty about the rate at which women are giving birth.

The precise "day of 7 billion" may not matter much. But the inaccuracies make it harder to answer a more important question: is human population set to peak within the next few decades or will it carry on growing beyond that?

Wolfgang Lutz of the Vienna Institute of Demography says the UN is "under political pressure to disregard uncertainty and name a date" for 7 billion. But he and colleague Sergei Scherbov estimate that the world probably won't reach 7 billion until early in 2013, though it could be as late as 2020.

The director of the UN population division Hania Zlotnik defends her data but agrees that "an interval of a few months or even a year would be a reasonable range of uncertainty".

One problem for demographers is undercounting. Even developed countries reckon their censuses miss up to 3 per cent of people. Up-to-date figures have to adjust for both this and the changes since the last census, which could be decades in the case of some African countries. So adjusting for extra people is routine.

The big danger, Scherbov says, may be overadjusting. The world has seen a dramatic decline in fertility in recent years, with the average woman now having only 2.5 children, half as many as her grandmother 50 years ago. So there may be far fewer new arrivals than demographers assume.

Take China, the world's largest country. Raw census data suggest that the average woman has 1.2 children, but this hides a multitude of problems. State demographers believe people are hiding tens of millions of babies to evade the one-child policy, and so estimate that the rate is 1.8. But Zhongwei Zhao of the Australian National University in Canberra says other figures in the 2010 census suggest the raw data may be nearer the truth. The UN currently plumps for 1.5 children per woman.

Discrepancies in estimating populations are amplified in long-term projections. Zhao says China's recent overadjusting of its fertility rate will turn into an overestimation of as much as 100 million by 2030.

India's demographic future is even more uncertain. The UN estimates that the country's population will grow from 1.2 billion to 1.7 billion by 2050, making it substantially bigger than China. But Scherbov and Lutz predict 1.4 billion, with a possible range from 1.1 to 1.7 billion.

All this is of huge importance for the planet. Earlier this year, the UN unexpectedly raised its estimates of future population, suggesting that the world would have more than 10 billion people by 2100. But Scherbov says there is no demographic evidence to justify this gloomier prediction. It arose from "a new set of assumptions about future fertility". For instance, following what Zlotnik calls "a major change in methodology", the UN upped its estimate of the number of children Nigerian women will be having in 2050 from 2.41 to 3.41.

The UN says world population will still be rising in 2100. Scherbov says there is an 85-per-cent chance it will have peaked by then. But nobody knows for sure."

end quote

We'll be ok as long as we build a tall fence along the borders.

Here is a link that might be useful: link


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Happy Birthday

It's already in debt.


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

Happy Birthday... here's your share of the bill?


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

And I thought you were wishing the NAVY happy birthday!!


Photobucket

We're so advanced that we don't need no stinking nuclear power any more!!

Photobucket

:-)

Here is a link that might be useful: Happy 236th B-day USN!!


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

USA USA USA rah rah!


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

I'll second that, Ink, only mine won't be patronizing!


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

Patronizing? What were these glorious photos meant to convey in a thread about over population houseful?


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

The powerful will force the overpopulation to bow to our superior military?


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

If those ships showed up in Rwanda where the effects of overpopulation is so well known, I bet you could fit a few hundred thousand poor kids on the decks.


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

My second reaction when seeding the carrier group picture was to marvel at the 2 to 3 trillion dollars floating or submerged. My first was to marvel at the power of the fleet, probably more powerful then the combined navies of WWII.


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

The powerful will force the overpopulation to bow to our superior military?

The photo is glorification of militarism; wars to sustain empire help reduce overpopulation - in the target area(s).


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

That is kind of what I thought Nancy. I realise that this effect was probably unintentional but it was just a tad insensitive,


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

"The photo is glorification of militarism; wars to sustain empire help reduce overpopulation - in the target area(s)."

Doesn't the thought of that just leave a sick feeling in the pit of your stomach? It does mine...


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

If those ships showed up in Rwanda where the effects of overpopulation is so well known, I bet you could fit a few hundred thousand poor kids on the decks.

Just one of those carriers could supply all the needed CLEAN fresh water needed.

What were these glorious photos meant to convey in a thread about over population houseful?

What-- you no spikka da english? I thought my post was pretty clear.

Unbelievable.


 o
post script

The photo is glorification of militarism;

nahhhh-- THIS is the glorification of militarism:

Photobucket


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

From a previous post "probably unintentional but it was just a tad insensitive" I take that back now that Bill has shown his true colours and a picture of updated waterboarding. Start you own thread why doncha.


 o
answering

The first pic post was good natured. This one, not so much.


 o
RE: Happy Birthday

Yeah... it's nice to see what our tax dollars are purchasing these days... and how it's all being used.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Hot Topics Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here