Return to the Hot Topics Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

Posted by nancy_in_venice_ca SS24 z10 CA (My Page) on
Sat, Dec 1, 12 at 0:57

The Cold War is over, the fiscal cliff is ahead, so why not spend billions on U.S. nuclear weapons in Europe. Shouldn't these weapons be decommissioned?

Pentagon Cries Poor, Starts $10 Billion Nuclear Weapon Upgrade

The Pentagon is facing its worst cash crunch in more than a decade, with potential cuts of up to a half-trillion dollars over the next decade if Congress doesn't act soon. Yet the U.S. military still somehow found the money on Tuesday to put a down payment on a $10 billion upgrade of its nuclear weapons in Europe...

...while the rest of the Defense Department is looking to save money, the costs for the mod 12 program keep going up. In May, the project -- which entails upgrading an estimated 400 weapons -- had a price tag of $6 billion. By July, that number had grown to $10 billion. That's not only the equivalent of two-thirds of what the federal government plans to spend on all nuclear weapon enhancements over the next twenty years. "It would be less expensive to build solid-gold replicas of each of the 700-pound B61s, even at near-record gold prices," as Lewis recently noted in Foreign Policy.

One reason why: the mod 12 [nuclear upgrade] project -- even though it's billed as a "life extension program" -- isn't just about replacing the components of the weapons that are decaying or corroding. (Independent experts say that would take a mere billion or two.) When you swap out the B61′s parachute for satellite-guided tail fin assembly, it introduces a new complication, Lewis adds. "An atomic bomb dropped without a parachute will explode before the airplane is safely away. That means [the federal government] must also redesign much of the packaging and components to survive 'laydown' -- i.e., thudding into the ground and then exploding a few moments later." An internal Pentagon audit showed 15 of the 29 planned changes for mod 12 are still technologically immature.

This couldn't possibly be the scenario for yet another cost over run by a defense contractor.


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

Pocket padding at it's finest, I guess...


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

The nuclear upgrade does NOT ignore the fiscal cliff.


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

Perhaps it laughs at the fiscal cliff.


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

Talk about moral decadence!


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

The Cold War is over. There should be no upgrades; let's get rid of the nuclear bombs in Europe.


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

So much for being worried that the US military is being diminished.....


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

  • Posted by ohiomom 3rdrockfromthesun (My Page) on
    Sat, Dec 1, 12 at 18:03

No problem, cut medicaid and medicare and throw in the rest of the social safety net and we can bomb another country into democracy!

Go go go...


 o
RE: Nuclear Upgrade Ignores Pentagon's Fiscal Cliff

Wait, I remember reading about this -- aren't these the American nuclear bombs Germany will refuse to support after 2020? Because in that year they're decommissioning the only planes that are capable of carrying them?

Here is a link that might be useful: 'another example of NATO saying one thing and doing another'


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Hot Topics Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here