|
| while driving. Some states have some form of a ban but I believe that all of them should have a total ban. Having been hit by a woman on a cell phone that almost put me in the hospital I totally agree and you have no choice but to agree with me... |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| While I retain my own right to choose, I would agree... mainly because too many accidents happen as a result of people on cell phones not paying attention to their driving. Several states do have laws regarding this, but either they're not enforced very well, or people aren't really paying attention to them. Today, while driving to and from the city, I bet I see more than 10 cell phone users driving... and IL has laws pertaining to this already. |
|
| Same here, it seems everyone is talking while driving. A report stated that this is more dangerous than drunk driving! |
|
| Women in big SUVs seem to be the worst culprits. As to driving while talking on the phone, so sorry, it's not a "right". Not when my kids are driving on the same roads you are. |
|
| Our cell phone law in New York is just another scofflaw. If you sit at a busy intersection, or in a busy parking lot for several minutes, you'll see literally dozens of people talking on cell phones. |
|
| I found it curious the NTSB showcased a crash caused by a young driver texting, to call for outlawing hands-free cell phone conversations. |
|
| An NPR program had a panelist who had studied voice, texting, and hands- free and found them all to be dangerous; granted, texting was the worst. |
|
- Posted by ronalawn82 z9FL (ronalawn08@gmail.com) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 9:11
| tobr24u, just for the record, I can choose to disagree with you....but I will not, on this issue. Defensive Driving has been likened to 'driving 5 vehicles - the one you are driving; the ones in front and behind you; and the ones on either side of you'. Those were the days before cell phones but I did drive a vehicle equipped with a two-way radio(phone) on farm roads where there was hardly any other traffic. Yet the Company rule was to "Stop while on the radio!" I confess to a certain nervousness (anxiety!) when any of those other 4 drivers in my proximity, is on a cell-phone. |
|
| I do not talk on my cell phone while driving and I don't give my cell phone number out widely. I have a land line, so if I am home, I would prefer to talk on the land line anyway. I see lots and lots of Mothers talking on the phone while carting their kids around. I don't want my kids to ride with other Mothers who talk on the phone while driving....even if they are my friends. I think talking on your cell phone, whereby you only have one available hand to operate your car in the event someone cuts you off/stops short in front of you, is child neglect. For real. |
|
- Posted by brushworks Zone5-Ohio (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 9:55
| I use Sync when driving my Fusion. Convenient, but still distracting. I do believe that this proposed law excludes factory installed bluetooth devices. Is that fair? While we are on the topic of distracted drivers, those who rock and roll and listen intently to pro sports are also distracted. Most who listen intently to a game are "in the game" not on the road. |
|
| The pro cell phone while driving people seem to think that it's no different from talking to a passenger in the car. I tend to think that one's mind relocates to where the person is on the other end of the line, thus mentally drifting away from driving. Texting is taking one's eye off the road, period. |
|
| I'll do it, and that rarely, when driving open roads with little or no traffic. But once I get to town, its just too distracting. That NPR interview with whozit from the NTSB talked about the poster child of this, some 19 yr old kid driving a semi crashing into a school bus yada yady, who had been texting something ridiculous like 18 times in the 4 minutes previous to the crash - couldn't ask him any details 'cause he was dead - along with some kids on the bus. |
|
| You need 2 hands to drive. Talking to a passenger does not require that you remove a hand from the wheel. Unless you are COMPLETELY engrossed, you would still be able to react. |
|
| Text and walk is a major problem in NYC have to say look up at least 4 or 5 times when walking near NYU so many text zombies moving around. Broadway below Houston St is like a slalom course. As Markjames wrote we have those laws in NY & they are scofflaws. Walking to work today I will see countless people yammering alone in their cars. |
|
| Rather than drive the freeway to work, my husbands adds 20 minutes to his time driving to work by driving the back roads into town because of the near accidents he as survived from people talking, texting, applying makeup, eating meals, turning around while driving to yell at the kiddies etc. He could manage it all until he began to see people texting constantly and that is when he gave it up and began to go the back ways. He is sorry he didn't do this years ago, it's a very beautiful, peaceful, quiet and bucolic drive into/out of the city. We will often do the freeways on the weekends though because the traffic is nothing compared to the work week, depending upon the time of day. We will do the freeway going into the city but come home the back roads as I also love the quite drive back, unless we need to get back earlier for any reason. About a month ago, we were on the freeway and I saw a man probably in his mid to late 20's driving and texting using BOTH HANDS!! All I can figure is that he kept the car on the road by driving with his knees, he was a tall man perhaps that might have been possible. I was so upset, how dangerous can one person be? I stared at him as my husband gunned the car to get away from him and he happened to look up and at me, he might have felt me looking at him. I shook my index finger at him with a huge frown on my face, I told my husband I felt like a friggin' school teacher and I will say he had the grace to look VERY ashamed and put both hands on the wheel. My husband had a fit, he told me that just as easily he could have pulled out a gun. Which is correct, of course. What is WRONG with people? I have never sued or been sued but if I ever am in an accident due to the use of a cell phone, I will have really BAD neck/back pain and personally sue the driver, bypassing the insurance if at all possible. These 'driving while using cell phone' people can't claim "I didn't know it was dangerous!" - like drunk drivers, when they take out the cell phone to call or read a text, they know exactly what chances they are taking with the wellfare of all those around them. And don't care. |
|
- Posted by marshallz10 z9-10 CA (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 13:46
| This is one of my buggaboos too. I have chatted a bit on cell phones while driving but never in traffic. I don't answer the tone or will ask that the caller hold while I leave the highway and stop. California has a law against use of cell phones and other electronic comm. devices unless Bluetooth or similar remote systems are in place. Texting should be cause for arrest and detention, the offending instrument confiscated. I drive back roads to get to work also. Last week I followed a woman for 16 miles while she weaved and bobbed and chatted away on her cell phone. All over the road, varying speeds independent of the driving situation... |
|
- Posted by nancy_in_venice_ca SS24 z10 CA (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 14:04
| Last week I followed a woman for 16 miles while she weaved and bobbed... Hey, I can do that without talking on a cell phone - just trying to improve reception on the FM band. Granted that I live in Venice, but it's not uncommon to see cyclists and skateboarders yaking on a cell phone on local streets and sidewalks. |
|
- Posted by marshallz10 z9-10 CA (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 14:35
| Twice a day, I struggle with the FM radio switching between 88.3 and its SB sister station 102.3 to keep tabs on NPR. In both situations I am driving on steep and curving road and often drift out of lane. I ought to be stopped and ticketed for driving while distracted by fondling FM radio. |
|
| Public good? Corporate battleground. Have to make it profitable for insurers. Insurers v Wireless carriers.... in this corner Verizon, in the far corner State Farm... ding, ding, ding. |
|
- Posted by silversword 9A (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 16:02
| I don't agree. I just drove around in downtown LA (on the I-5. 101 and 405)over the weekend and had several great conversations, all the while managing to avoid several accidents happening around me and dodging crazy drivers and pedestrians. Then again, I have the in-car speaker thingie as well as headphones. I haven't used a cell phone next to my ear in ages (in or out of the car). In CA it's illegal to use w/o bluetooth but I see cops doing it all the time, as well as other drivers. It's common to be sandwiched between a "sports mom" in an Escalade putting on her makeup, swatting kids and using one hand for her phone. All that, and she gives the finger if I honk. I've started calling it in and reporting it. If I have to text and drive, I give my phone to DD in the backseat and she does it for me :) Honestly, helping DD with homework (especially math) is really distracting in the car too. |
|
- Posted by silversword 9A (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 16:06
| As a side note, you know what is really distracting on our freeways? COPS. They pull drivers over on the side, everyone rubber necks to watch and traffic grinds to a halt. DD and I were stuck in traffic 10 miles from our location for over an hour because there were two cop cars on an overpass ahead of us pulling someone over or something. On the way home I counted 15 cop cars pulling people over on the side of the freeway and each time there was an instant where I thought I was going to be hit, or someone next to me was because everyone was panicking over the cops or lookie-lou-ing. It makes me BATTY. They should have to pull people off the freeway to give tickets. They also stop drivers in the street here, you;ll be driving along and all of a sudden the lane ahead is blocked by someone getting a ticket. DANGEROUS!! |
|
- Posted by brushworks Zone5-Ohio (My Page) on Mon, Dec 19, 11 at 16:20
| Our freeways have ample room on the shoulder of the road, but that doesn't stop rubber-necking drivers from creating a hazardous situation. I find that the sheriff and locals cause the most dangerous situations. The state police always move the cars alongside the grassy area of the shoulder. The local police used to use a speaker to instruct a driver where to pull over, but not anymore. They block a lane, even if it's rush hour. |
|
| I don't talk on my phone while driving. But I do think there should be less cellphone-bashing. Especially, when it comes from the person I just saw reading a paper or eating while driving. I also loathe when someone is putting on makeup instead of using the rearview mirror properly! Talking to passengers is also a distraction. Any distraction is unsafe. To pick on cellphone owners, well, it's just too limited. No more drive through eaters please! Those are the worst. I call them knee/elbow drivers. Sheesh! The bumper sticker should read "No more distracted driving!" rather than picking on one group. _________________________________________ For instance, when I found out men did a better job of picking up the right thing by calling their wives while at the grocery store, I didn't mind them so much. I still don't want to see your light come on, regardless if it's to talk or to text, if we're in a movie theater though. Two examples. But then, I live in a world where cellphones are attached to people 24/7 as a necessity (hosptial environment), so I may be off of the mainstream. :) |
|
| We have and use the bluetooth ear piece thingy for receiving calls while in transit, though we usually say something like, "let me call you back when we get to where we're going." We're not that comfortable yakking on the phone, even hands free, while cruising down the interstate... you just don't know how attentive other drivers around you are. I lost count today, of people engaged in other activities while driving. We were almost sideswiped twice by people changing lanes without signaling, both drivers happily gabbing away on cell phones, paying no attention whatsoever to their surroundings, not using the mirrors that came with their vehicles. It's very dangerous out there! People walk around, or bicycle, heads and eyes looking downward at whatever they're texting... situational awareness is at an all time low, or so it seems. I'm kind of surprised we haven't heard of an increase in petty theft, like purse snatching and pocket picking, mainly because people are not paying attention to their immediate surroundings... they're otherwise engaged in technological communication or internet viewing.
|
|
| Driving while on the phone is illegal here in Quebec. Walking down the street talking to yourself is certifiable unless you have the magic button in your ear, "Oh he's not crazy, he is on the phone." Walking down the street on the phone sure sounds crazy to me.It makes people feel important but Umberto Eco reckoned that a really savvy person would have their business sorted before they left the office. I was stopped at the light one day alongside a Chelsea tractor, the woman sitting behind the wheel was smoking a cigarette with a coffee in the other hand, her phone rang just before the lights changed. As you may know Montreal is the home of the cirque du soleil and I believe this woman performed there as the next scene was pure magic. Me, I nearly missed the light and spilled my coffee in my lap I was laughing so much. |
|
| I totally support the ban. In this area a woman was on her cell, and applying make up when she ran over a policeman killing him. She's in jail for two years. I was never so annoyed as when my daughter took me to NYC to see Wicked in June, and the woman in front of us was texting the whole time. IDIOT!!! She was checking her FB page. Like being in a Broadway theater watching a wonderful play with her family wasn't enough for her ..she had to check her status on FB??? Drives me nuts. In the grocery store, they either talk extra loud so everyone hears them, or they just block the aisles, totally clueless. |
|
| Someone we know recently killed a teenage female pedestrian when they looked down at their cell phone to see who was calling. This person and their spouse -the caller can't live with themselves. Last month, a woman driving a SUV drifted half way into my lane of oncoming traffic while she appeared to be texting. When I looked in my rear-view mirror her SUV was 3/4 off the road. She must have been startled, then over-corrected when her tires hit the shoulder as it looked like her SUV was going to flip over. We see people biking, boating, skiing, snowboarding and skating while using cell phones as well. It's only going to get worse as population, traffic and users of technology increases and situational awareness decreases. All you can do is drive, walk, shop, bike, boat, run, ski and skate defensively. It helps to drive a safe vehicle, or a commercial vehicle. You need to be able to swerve, brake, or accelerate to avoid some accidents as well, so make sure you have good tires, brakes, steering, suspension and keep your RPMs in the power-band if possible. |
|
| Driving a commercial vehicle automatically makes you responsible for everyone around you, and not just yourself. In any situation where you are the commercial driver, you are the professional behind the wheel. You are on the job, working, and therefore in control and expected to avoid any possible accidents. In a majority of cases, you will be the one issued tickets should an accident occur... for failure to avoid the accident. That's just commercial driving 101, common knowledge taught to everyone potentially issued a CDL or chauffeur's license. I would have to agree with Umberto Eco's idea... a professional will take care of business before entering the public domain. Yesterday, while awaiting our appointment, I can't even tell you how many cell phones rang while we were sitting in the waiting room. It was annoying as all get out... people loudly talking on their phones, beeps and music and the sounds of technology going off all around us. It was very inconsiderate to others... we're talking about a small doctor's office waiting room. I'm just as happy as most folks that this technology exists to make our lives better... but there's a time and place for its use. Those times and places do not include while operating a moving vehicle or waiting in what should be a rather quiet place. Common courtesy and/or general safety should tell us this much.
|
|
| Until they start "enforcing" existing cellular laws and/or make penalties stiffer - larger fines and license suspensions, they'll remain scofflaws. |
|
| Jodi, please re-read my tangent. If those were conversations they could have if the conversant was present, they seem to be ok. If you don't agree, please explain why they are not, and how it was rude to you? Thanks! I would like to see it from another angle if I am wrong. |
|
| "I do believe that this proposed law excludes factory installed bluetooth devices. Is that fair?" Brush, The articles I read talked about banning ALL cell phone calls. If you have other information, I would be interested in reading it. I hope you're right. My car has a factory installed system so that all I have to do is push a single button on my rear view mirror to take a call. DH just bought a used car with low miles at CARMAX, and had a similar system installed there. It cost 4 or 5 hundred dollars, and all he has to do is push a button to take a call. I think most folks agree that driving with one hand and fumbling with a cell phone in the other is just asking for trouble. But I still do not understand why the NTSB did not make the case for banning hands free conversations with data, instead of pointing to a texting driver with limited driving experience. If the data exists and the studies are solid, I think it's really odd that the NTSB did not share that information when it called for the ban. |
|
| I wasn't responding to your particular post in any way, Robin... but since you ask... I feel it's rude to loudly converse while sitting in the outer sanctum of a doctor's office, where it's not unusual to find people who aren't feeling well for a variety of reasons. There are many places where it would be considered rude or discourteous to act loud and vociferous, cell phone or not, a doctor's office being only one. Most people, if face to face, would speak quietly together while waiting their turn. To be loud in this situation is simply rude. We could pick on people who shave or read or apply makeup while driving... except, this thread is about cell phones in particular, and purposefully targets users of technology. The gist of the whole thing is banning the use of cell phones while driving, as a dangerous distraction... and though it doesn't say that cell phones are the only distraction, it is the current one up for discussion. I think it's equally dangerous to do anything else while operating a moving vehicle... anything that takes your concentration away from driving and from what's going on around you and your vehicle. Let's face it... some people aren't the greatest of drivers WITHOUT a cell phone in hand! Place one in their hand, and it's a recipe for certain disaster... an accident waiting to happen! But even the best of drivers can become distracted by technology, or by anything else... taking your eyes off the road for a few seconds can have life changing results... as I well know, now destined to suffer for whatever distraction caused the people behind us to plow right into the vehicle we were in at a very high rate of speed. Certainly, there are many distractions that make driving dangerous. Cell phones are not the only one. However, the title and subject of this thread are centered around cell phones. |
|
| If people cant grocery shop while talking on the phone(blocking the aisles etc) even with a bluetooth then can they drive? It seems to me the case is proven everytime you go to the store. What is all this yapping about anyway? I am tired of hearing the uninteresting details of the lives of all the people around me. |
|
| Sorry, I didn't think you were addressing me. I said what is correct in basic-everyday situations. If you feel everyone was ailing, that would not be a basic, everyday situation. That I get; "doctors office" seems to be a place conversations could happen, barring ailing folks. But, (and here's that thing again!)--I disagree to ban cell phone usage. So I voice my opinion and you try to tell me to stay on topic. I wasn't off topic. Cell phone users are bashed because ??? Pick on the wrong way of driving, not one group who is driving wrong. Widen your horizons, there are loads of people who drive wrong. Get them all back on task! I don't eat and drive or change the radio station ever. I also don't ever look at my passenger unless completely stopped. So I do walk the walk. |
|
| The new stats out now indicate that more car accidents are now caused by cell phone users than by driving after drinking. |
|
- Posted by marshallz10 z9-10 CA (My Page) on Tue, Dec 20, 11 at 15:14
| rob, what a cop out. Last weekend I attended a neighbor's Christmas party and chatted with a nephew-in-law who is soon retiring from the Sheriff Department. He complained about all the distracted drivers on State roads, mostly attributable to either use of cell phones or other electronics. He was also pissed because the Department would not allow him to retain the right to carry a concealed weapon after he retired. He is down right nervous about spending the next 20-30 years looking over his shoulder for some old perp to strike. |
|
| I wish humans were smart enough not to need these laws. |
|
| cop out? I want ALL distracted drivers to be clamped down on and that's a cop out? I don't understand. |
|
- Posted by marshallz10 z9-10 CA (My Page) on Tue, Dec 20, 11 at 16:16
| The cop out is preserving the right to use electronics until all the other distractions are limited by law and law enforcement. (???) |
|
| Either get rid of all rights or leave them all alone and let folks make good decisions. Punish it at the time the problem occurs based on what happens at the scene. Why is one right reasonable, but the other is not? Because the other behaviors I've listed are not any better than the cellphone thing. I've seen plenty of studies that showed turning around and addressing passengers was the number ONE reason for accidents. Statistics will prove anything, but I do believe the other things are just as harmful. To pick them is so arbitrary. However, I don't see anything I say to be a cop out. I already said I didn't do it or anything else distracting when I drive. I just drive. It's a little bitty car and I call it one step above a motorcycle. Really it (a Miata) is. Do you know I've been sideswipped by drivers three times in hit and runs (on THEIR part) in the past five years? The most recent of which was a couple of weeks ago. It is an ongoing problem. I'm driving along, minding my own business and BOOM, I get hit. And they drive on. |
|
| That's just it, though... people don't always make good decisions. The human race can't always be counted on when it comes to sound decision making. Sometimes, it's necessary to legislate to protect people from those decisions which may harm them, or decisions others make that might harm you. We have rights... but we need those rights protected from people who would try to take them away or interfere. While it's true that we can't legislate stupidity, we can legislate when that stupidity becomes a large problem that consistently hurts others. When talking on a cell phone while operating a moving vehicle starts to rack up accident and death statistics, it's time to look into legislation that can protect people from this poorly made decision to yak on a phone while operating that moving vehicle. And as to being rude... Would it be courteous to strike up a loud conversation during Mass? Would you answer your cell phone in church? Would you even have the ringer on? How about at a public library? What about a funeral home? There are simply some places where being loud and obnoxious is rude and discourteous. The guy sitting next to me in the waiting room was practically yelling into his phone! Was that necessary? No, it was not. He could just as easily have stepped outside to receive his call. But he didn't. He sat there, yelling into his phone. It was very rude. I didn't say that we should legislate so people couldn't be on the phone in doctors' offices... I said it was rude. Common sense should be all we need to make the decision to turn down the ringer and keep our voices at a normal pitch while we're in small spaces with other people... especially in the waiting room of a doctor's office, which often contains people who are not feeling well, ergo their visit to see a doctor. That's nothing more than common sense and common courtesy. |
|
| Maybe the gentleman had hearing loss or was hearing impaired jodik. You're assuming he was rude when his yelling may have been disability related. |
|
| And maybe you would understand the situation more clearly if you had actually been there... but you weren't. There are more variables involved... the guy was young, the guy spoke in normal tones to the other family members there with him when he wasn't on his damn phone, and the moment his phone rang and he answered it, he began shouting. Most people would have the common sense and courtesy to step outside and take the call if they thought they'd have to talk loud or shout. But why am I explaining it to you... the issue is rudeness, and you weren't there and it doesn't involve you. Back to the topic of cell phones and driving... |
|
| Of course I wasn't there, but our DD2 was substantially hearing impaired most of her young life. The inability to modulate her voice was a byproduct of her deafness, especially when on the phone. Something to consider before you assume rudeness. |
|
| You keep leaving off the important piece. IF IT IS NORMAL to have a conversation, it doesn't matter if it is over a phone or in person. No, I wouldn't talk in Mass (for me-ordinary church service). I don't even take my phone into the building, so how could I answer it? Nor would I at a funeral. But I would expect my boss to take his and answer it if vibrated. He's a physican. What seems "common sense" to you is coming off as "do it your way". It's very black and white to you, but really it's very very grey. AND Yes, people will always make the wrong choice, but you cannot legislate morality. Mostly, I don't need the government to tell me right from wrong (this is what makes me a "conservative", this extra leaning in social context). Them, of all groups! |
|
- Posted by hamiltongardener CAN 6a (My Page) on Wed, Dec 21, 11 at 8:40
| Do you know I've been sideswipped by drivers three times in hit and runs (on THEIR part) in the past five years? The most recent of which was a couple of weeks ago. It is an ongoing problem. I'm driving along, minding my own business and BOOM, I get hit. If this is an ongoing problem, are you sure that it's all the other people at fault? Sorry, I know that sounds antagonistic but that's not how I mean it, just not sure how to word it. Not sure of your driving ability or age or anything, that's why I'm asking. My great aunt used to complain in a similar fashion all the time about how people kept hitting her bumpers at the mall, grocery store, etc. It too, was an ongoing problem. The problem is that it was my aunt who was the one unable to judge how close she was to other vehicles and was unaware that she was hitting them. She "parked" on family members' bumpers on several occassions. It took a very long time to convince her that she didn't have the driving skills necessary for operating a vehicle. She honestly didn't realize it. |
|
| HG, Yes, I am quite certain. |
|
- Posted by silversword 9A (My Page) on Wed, Dec 21, 11 at 12:45
| I get Rob's point. My DR office has a sign - turn off your cell phone. People rarely talk in there, let alone on their phones. If they did, the receptionist would be quick to point to the sign and ask them to step outside. But our doctor's office also states that customers should not wear perfume in the office. I think cell phones should be allowed anywhere that you'd be speaking to another person anyway without disturbing those around you. Animals unrestrained in vehicles are also the cause of accidents. I've seen more people swerving around the road, juggling hot coffee and their little ball of yappy fluff that's scampering around the front seat, in their lap, on the dash, etc. here in CA than in any other place I've driven. I saw a man driving down the I-5 last week with his knees (I was going 70-ish and he passed me) and he was smoking his pot pipe. I shook my finger at him. He was old enough to be my dad. Cell phones are dangerous on the road. That's why I used hands free before it was a law. But inattentive driving is the problem, it's not the object that is the issue. Any object may cause distraction. Yesterday after reading this post I looked around at how many people were using their phones to text while waiting on the metered on-ramp. I counted four, and there were around ten cars around me. BTW, it's against the law for minors to use their cell phones while driving. I think this is a good law. |
|
| This is what I'm saying, Silver... it's simply discourteous to disturb others in places where a little quiet is appreciated. A doctor's office would qualify as one of those places. I haven't noticed whether they've put up a "turn off cell phones" sign yet... it's a newer office they've moved into. But that shouldn't matter. Decent manners and common sense should tell people that they probably shouldn't disturb others with loud ring tones or loud conversation in certain places. As for poor driving habits... I know a woman who swears up and down that her car accelerates and brakes on its own, and she's had the thing in for service at least three times to have these "issues" fixed. Not surprisingly, nothing is ever found to be wrong with the vehicle... she drives with both feet, usually wearing clunky boots, and I've watched her feet slip on the pedals more than once. Unfortunately, you can't argue with someone who knows everything and is always right. It's her habit to never admit to mistakes, and so... she's an accident waiting to happen. Not surprisingly, I try to avoid riding along with her. There are many people out there on the roads of our nation who are not the skilled drivers they think themselves to be. Some hug the left side of the lane, some hug the right side of the lane, some drive too fast for conditions or too slow for conditions, some drive erratically, some can't seem to pay attention and have to fiddle with things inside the vehicle... some don't use turn signals, some are too afraid to pass bigger vehicles on four lane highways... and the list goes on. When I was taught to drive, we were told to drive ahead of ourselves, always anticipating, driving defensively. I actually learned to drive during winter when the roads were at their very worst. I feel that made me a better driver. I drove for decades without getting any tickets or causing any accidents. Today, I don't care to drive much. My eyesight isn't what it once was, and I just don't feel very confident behind the wheel. I'd rather admit that and leave the driving to my husband, than to pretend everything is great and risk an accident. I don't think some people will become serious about following cell phone laws until our police begin to take the laws seriously and start handing out tickets for driving while talking on a cell phone.
|
|
- Posted by hamiltongardener CAN 6a (My Page) on Wed, Dec 21, 11 at 13:44
| I don't think some people will become serious about following cell phone laws until our police begin to take the laws seriously and start handing out tickets for driving while talking on a cell phone. Yeah, but if they do that then everyone will start whining how the dirty pigs are just power tripping and harassing people. |
|
| Insurers need to take it seriously. If studies show cell phone use increases risk cell phone users need to pay higher premiums. Send the ticket directly to the insurer... |
|
| Posted by hamiltongardener CAN 6a (My Page) on Wed, Dec 21, 11 at 13:44 I don't think some people will become serious about following cell phone laws until our police begin to take the laws seriously and start handing out tickets for driving while talking on a cell phone. Yeah, but if they do that then everyone will start whining how the dirty pigs are just power tripping and harassing people. * Hamilton, you day have a knack for spotting hypocrisy. |
|
| The same thing happened when seat belt laws first went into effect. People finally realized the law was serious when they began getting ticketed for driving without seat belts buckled. Now, it's second nature to buckle up when you get into your car. Change doesn't happen overnight, but it does happen... especially when it starts costing people money. Some folks may whine... oh, well... in time, using a wireless ear piece will be second nature... just like seat belt laws. |
|
| Cell phones are great if used as they ought to be: On a recent Amtrak 30 day rail pass, mine allowed me to keep in touch with my loved ones while traversing the country. When I'm putting in my four miles on the walking track every morning, I'll turn it on in case of an emergency. If I arrive at a designated meet point and the meetup doesn't happen, it is good for re-coordinating plans. I never turn it on while om the road-I have voice mail at home. I had the experience of following a woman on a two lane road in a late model Lincoln that abruptly stopped. I could see her mouth moving through the rear view mirror and I thought she had a child issue and they were to short for me to see. She gunned the car and went 30 yards and jerked to a stop again. Same mouth movement again and I was thinking of walking up and asking if she had a mechanical problem, but then she shot forward again and finally entered the parking lot of a Hair Salon. I followed her in and asked if she needed help and she said "Mind your own business". So much for chivalry and my thought is that bluetooth and "online" options should be as illegal as handheld phones. |
|
| What did we ever do before the advent of portable communication? Good grief! |
|
| Lol HG! |
|
- Posted by maddie_athome (My Page) on Wed, Dec 21, 11 at 21:10
| Pathetic. |
|
| >What is all this yapping about anyway? I am tired of hearing the uninteresting details of the lives of all the people around me< At first I thought you were talking about the forum. |
|
- Posted by nancy_in_venice_ca SS24 z10 CA (My Page) on Wed, Dec 21, 11 at 21:44
| At first I thought you were talking about the forum. LOL! |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Hot Topics Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.