Return to the Hot Topics Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Wealth Redistribution

Posted by Big_Papi none (My Page) on
Tue, Dec 27, 11 at 10:31

"If he wants money. Get a job. Work, like everybody else in this world."

As opposed to OWS and all their thuggery.

Couldn't have said it better if I tried.

Here is a link that might be useful: And take this home with ya!


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Thug indeed. He's lucky a swollen face is all he got.

I predict you'll see more of this as hard working people are tired of being robbed.

I also predict someone will see the thug as a victim.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Crazy train still in station. This is about OWS and Wealth distribution how? Im not sure why I opened the link, but after reading the comments Im wondering are these people simpletons or brain damaged? Wonder if the clerk and assailant names were reversed how it would have been perceived by them. Store robberies only happen how often a day in this country...

Strange dayzz


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

  • Posted by ohiomom 3rdrockfromthesun (My Page) on
    Tue, Dec 27, 11 at 10:51

Have seen store clerks stand up to would be robbers before, but what in the world does this have to do with "occupy wallstreet" ?

Right now "occupiers" are busy across the nation trying to help people facing (in some cases) illegal foreclosures. Some of us know who the robbers are in these cases.

When you commit a crime, whether you hold up a bank or are the bank, you should be arrested and charged with a crime.

....and liberty and justice for some


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"This is about OWS and Wealth distribution how?"

The thug is just cutting out the middle man. When you're in a hurry to get the money you haven't worked for, there's a faster way than waiting for bureaucrats and politicians to do the redistribution. You can always take a direct route and mug the working guy yourself.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

The thug is just cutting out the middle man. When you're in a hurry to get the money you haven't worked for, there's a faster way than waiting for bureaucrats and politicians to do the redistribution. You can always take a direct route and mug the working guy yourself.

*

Nik, who knows how to cut out the middle man nonsense to get to the truth and heart of a matter.


 o
um what

sooo stick-ups hold-ups, muggings, thousands of everyday crimes are now about OWS and wealth distribution.

lmao


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"lmao"

The truth hurts sometimes.....this is one of those times.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

This is the silliest thread in quite some time. Who reads that story and says to themselves, "This is a valid comparison to the OWS protests"?
That is quite a leap in logic.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

egg nog


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

  • Posted by kwoods Cold z7 Long Is (My Page) on
    Tue, Dec 27, 11 at 12:27

Ha! B of A, Goldman, Morgan Stanley.... etc., etc., onand on and on....

THESE are the thugs stealing hard earned money from working folks. All the stick-up men and street criminals in the world don't hold a candle to these guys and their facilitators in govt. when it comes to wealth redistribution.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

That is quite a leap in logic.

Since when is logic a requisite in this joint?


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

The do nothings stealing from the doers? Heh.....willful blindness is a terrible disease.

"THESE are the thugs stealing hard earned money from working folks. All the stick-up men and street criminals in the world don't hold a candle to these guys and their facilitators in govt. when it comes to wealth redistribution."

Tell that to thug in your face with his 9mm when he demands your money for his next crack rock.


 o
Neural Redistribution

  • Posted by kwoods Cold z7 Long Is (My Page) on
    Tue, Dec 27, 11 at 12:53

Random much?


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"The do nothings stealing from the doers? Heh.....willful blindness is a terrible disease."

I would say that willful ignorance is worse.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

whiskers on kittens!


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

The do nothings stealing the Dewars.


 o
RE: Wealth flatulence

Newt refused to pay alimony his wife had to have a food drive now that's wealth distribution ...of a fat asseted thug.
Joe Walsh Wealth distribution that's what I call a dead beat dad tea party hero!!!!
These are a few of my favorite things!
When the dog bites when the bee stings when the primaries going bad I simply remember......
I'm sure glad I'm not as deluded as this post!


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

That dude has great hands. You can bet he has extensive boxing and/or mixed martial experience. Really nice, very little signal, straight down the middle, body behind the shot.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

I also predict someone will see the thug as a victim.

Based on what?

Another thread to toss out the window.

-Ron-


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

jerzeegirl said:
The do nothings stealing the Dewars.

You always seem to know how to distill things. ;-)

Big Papi:

You Righties have lost moderates who agree with the vast majority of voters about income inequality. People get it that the top tier has benefited from many of the very things that brought the economy to the brink of collapse in 2008.
So go ahead, keep attacking the OWS and trying to associate it with a fringe. It just demonstrates how out of touch Romney and other Righties are with the middle class, especially those who have been hit hard during this recession.
ReBushlicans are looking meaner and meaner to the middle class in this country all the time.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"That dude has great hands. You can bet he has extensive boxing and/or mixed martial experience. Really nice, very little signal, straight down the middle, body behind the shot."

The little douche bag thug is lucky to be alive. Not that exterminating the cretin would be any great loss to society. You can bet he's done the same thing numerous times before.

"Normally I'm armed and I woulda just shot 'em."

Had he come in my business, he'd have left in a different fashion. Some of my employees carry at work as do I.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

  • Posted by ohiomom 3rdrockfromthesun (My Page) on
    Tue, Dec 27, 11 at 17:09

...guess 34 billion dollars doesn't buy much "police protection" for the store owners eh ??

Here is a link that might be useful: Big Guns !!


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Gad big p-you kill people over stuff? Peace on Earth to you too...


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"Gad big p-you kill people over stuff? Peace on Earth to you too..."

Peckerweed was armed. It's as simple as that. Don't wanna get shot? Don't rob me or my business. Pretty basic, really.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Fly fishing for librule kicks you feeding a blog Big?


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Re: the OP.

It appears to me that yet another forum member, Big Papi, also seems to fear the general idea behind OWS and it's supporters, as evidenced by his general comments and bigotry regarding the protesters and the movement.

I find the reaction of some of generalized fear/bigotry when referring to OWS to be interesting.

I would ask what is behind it, but every time I have, I have gotten nothing but denials of fear or bigotry, so I make my own conjectures.

I do believe that the reality behind the bigotry/fear I read in this forum would be much more interesting than any of my conjectures, based on what I've read from any of the posts I've read to date.

The focused attention of the bad behavior of the very few, the less than 0.1% few who probably aren't even a valid OWS member, strikes me as petulant childishness. I don't know if that is what it is but that is how it strikes me and how it reads to me.

As it pertains to this particular group of American protesters, I find it very puzzling because what they want for change would be of benefit to us ALL, including the fearful bigots AND their beloved children/grandchildren. And Tea Party club members, and arch conservatives, extreme liberals, the libertarians and everyone in between.

That strikes me as deliberate tunnel vision, choosing to embrace bigoted point of view rather than an attempt at understanding the message, it's origin and why the movement exists or even agreeing that a single valid point behind the OWS movement needs addressing.

this point of view, to me, is an enigma.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Why don't we redistribute the playing field so it's fair... and let the chips fall where they may then?

I thought not...


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

How do you intend to do that jodik?


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Well, it would be mighty helpful if we could elect honest, ethical representatives, wouldn't it? That might be a start.

It's too bad the unethical, dishonest, and greedy fight tooth and nail to keep the corruption and greed going.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"Why don't we redistribute the playing field so it's fair... and let the chips fall where they may then?

I thought not... "

Everybody is born equal, so I'm sure that the chips have already fallen.

And why would I want to give my hard earned cash to a fringe/sect of the population who would sit in a park, smoke weed and trade diseases rather than doing something constructive...oh let me see here....like actually working to better themselves and their position in life.

Even were I inclined to do something so foolish, I have serious doubts that the behavior would result in a positive change.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Funny to me the difference in interpreting OWS as well. You have to get past the idiots in the clown suits. Someone like Naomi Klein who talks to dozens of protestors around the country finds that the protestors are talking about enforcing specific banking regulations and repealing specific legislation, while the other 'side' just stops at the idiots in the clown suits.

Because when you actually look at the specific things at the heart of the OWS, there is wide spread agreement - the concept of banks being 'too big to fail' is wrong, that there are far too many incestuous ties between regulators and the regulated, that lobbyists writing the legislation is wrong, etc. The difference is that the right blames the government, and the OWS looks at who pays the piper.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"Everybody is born equal, so I'm sure that the chips have already fallen."

BP--Cranberry Juice on my monitor!


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"Everybody is born equal" in what way? You yourself are repeating talking points that have been refuted over and over again so there doesn't appear to be equality of intelligence papi.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

"BP--Cranberry Juice on my monitor!"

heh.....Send the bill to Jodik, she can set the example for wealth redistribution for all of us!


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

You've got that backwards, papi, but it is a favorite talking point... I'll give you that.

Death is the great equalizer... not birth.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Death is the great equalizer... not birth.

*

Not for a positive life, well lived, and successful, it's not.

Death after a life like that is far preferable to a miserable, negative existence in life.


 o
Monitor Fine

BTW, BP, it cleaned up fine.

As much as I like to help the economy, I don't want to replace a one year old desktop monitor!


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

And why would I want to give my hard earned cash to a fringe/sect of the population who would sit in a park, smoke weed and trade diseases rather than doing something constructive...oh let me see here....like actually working to better themselves and their position in life.

LMAO. What a clueless chump. Papi, someone should break it to you - this will probably be a shock but, you are NOT a member of the 1% and never will be so you don't have to worry about redistribution. In the scheme of things, you are small potatoes. You should probably just get used to that fact. The OWS is not responsible for your failure(s) in life especially your inability to get rich.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

I saw a cut from a meeting of the Occupy Iowa Caucus group. Looked like a pretty normal group of people to me.

I was impressed with what I heard so I went looking for something on the WEB and found this.

This is what I hoped would happen. That the movement would grow to be a more uniform, coherent group with some loose type of leadership. I have a feeling they will be a voice to be reckoned with in this election cycle....at least I hope they are.

Here is a link that might be useful: Occupy Iowa


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

  • Posted by kwoods Cold z7 Long Is (My Page) on
    Wed, Dec 28, 11 at 12:30

Why do people try to discredit this movement by saying the participants don't work?

Are they really saying "I'm a wage slave, there is nothing better for me, accept the same fate, nothing better is coming, life sucks then you die."? It seems almost like a weird kind of fatalism. Rise up, things can be made better. I could not be happier that people are making a choice to fight what seems like a monolithic and immutable inherently corrupt system. We don't have to accept the status quo, there is better.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

Why do people try to discredit this movement by saying the participants don't work?

Most people don't say that. You can't stop some people from exposing their ignorance.

-Ron-


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

I could not be happier that people are making a choice to fight what seems like a monolithic and immutable inherently corrupt system. We don't have to accept the status quo, there is better.

See Russia today. Let alone Syria, Egypt, etc.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

There are many reasons someone would accept the status quo... because they're profiting from it, because of ignorance, complacency, fear... and the list goes on. But we don't have to accept the status quo... especially when we can see what's so obviously unequal and unfair, and how it's hurting a large portion of our population! It's our Constitutional right to gather and let our government know we're not happy with the current state of affairs!

I, too, couldn't be happier to see people finally standing up and saying, "enough is enough! This isn't right, and it isn't fair!"

Too many people have become conditioned to let others do the thinking for them, and they never bother to research what's going on and find out what the real truth is, what the facts are! They've become complacent, allowing biased corporate entertainment outlets to give them what they think is news, which they then take at face value.

I'm not entirely sure where logical thought and common sense have gone within the general population, but I'm sure glad to see contingents of people that still possess these characteristics actually standing up for what they know to be right! If we don't stand up now, we could be a lot deeper in the mud later!

I'd much rather see positive change happen now without a lot of violence, than live through an actual revolution complete with martial law and a death toll.

Those that try to discredit OWS are either in need of glasses and a wake up call, or they're shills for the puppeteers. What other explanation could there be?



 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

The other explanation is that there is your facts, and then there is someone else's facts. Doesn't mean you are wrong, and it doesn't mean that they are wrong. People have different ideas on how they would like to achieve the same results. That is where the difference is. Not the results, but the means of getting there.

I personally think OWS is doing more harm than good. Although I do understand that there are some genuine people who've taken up the cause. That's my opinion, and I'm entitled to it. If you think it is a good movement, that is fine, as long as you don't trample on my private property, interfere with my business, or my rights as a citizen.


 o
RE: Wealth Redistribution

People are very resistant to change, even if it's change which will greatly benefit them. To change one's surroundings often requires a change in other areas, especially how they think.

Many will be content with the status quo that they already know, especially if that means that no change will be required for or by them. They know what they deal with today - change that and then they enter into the great unknown.

Unless one benefits financially by how things are done today and by changing how things are done today would negatively impact that benefit (or threaten to, or be perceived to threaten) then this is the only explaination I can come up with about the fear and bigotry when it comes to OWS and the reasons for the movement.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Hot Topics Forum

Instructions

  • You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
  • HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
  • No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.



 
Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.