Saturday April 9 Flagship Sponsor Farmers' Rights to Apply Pesticides Challenged WASHINGTON, D.C., April 8, 2005 – Threats of a lawsuit have forced a Maine blueberry grower to abandon his legal right to aerial spray. The threat of legal action is an abuse of the court system and warrants immediate attention from Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. The Maine blueberry farm of Jasper Wyman & Son was threatened with a lawsuit by activist groups unless the family farm sought Clean Water Act permits to aerially apply pesticides. Jasper Wyman & Son announced yesterday that it would cease aerial spraying because the legal defense costs would threaten the 125-year old farm's existence. AFBF supports the farm's decision and understands that family farmers normally don't have the financial resources to defend themselves against lawsuits brought by coalitions of activist groups, said AFBF President Bob Stallman. In spite of the activists' claims, for the last three decades, the EPA, and now the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, have said that Clean Water Act permits are not necessary for pesticides applied in compliance with federal pesticide laws and regulations. After the threat, the Wymans asked Maine DEP whether they needed a permit. Maine DEP said "no" and also issued a letter explaining this long-held policy to the activists' attorney. "If the activists want changes, then they should take on the EPA or ask Congress to change laws, rather than attacking family-run businesses," Stallman said. The decision by Wyman & Son to bow to activists' demands now increases the urgency for EPA and congressional action. This is the second blueberry farmer to relent in the face of lawsuits. The groups that threatened the lawsuits have stated they intend to establish a new "standard" and force their will on other farmers through threats of litigation. In deciding not to aerially apply, Wyman and Son is not admitting any liability to apply for a permit or violation of the Clean Water Act. The farming operation also reserves the right to once again aerially apply if it can obtain protection against these lawsuits. -30- Contacts: Tracy Taylor Grondine (202) 406-3642 tracyg@fb.org Richard Keller (202) 406-3640 keller@fb.org This page was last modified Fri Apr 08, 2005 at 12:06 pm [News] [FB News] [Views] [State Connection] [Issues] [Legislative Action] [Features] [AG Links] [About Farm Bureau] [Farm Bureau Programs] [Farm Bureau Affiliates] [OnLine Brochures] © 1996-2004 - American Farm Bureau Federation. Legal Notice American Farm Bureau Federation, Farm Bureau and the FB Logo are registered service marks of the American Farm Bureau Federation. Voice of Agriculture is a registered service mark of the American Farm Bureau Federation. Newsroom News Releases Newsline AGFeed State Roundup Current Issue Past Issues The Ag Agenda Focus State Viewpoints State Farm Bureaus Backgrounders Priority Issues Analysis Letters/Docs Link to Congress FB ACT Members Only Legislative Awards Web Watch Past Polls Ag Links We Are Farm Bureau AFBF President Email Webmaster Staff Directory Annual Meeting County Idea Exchange Educating About Ag Farmer Idea Exchange Food Check-Out Day Foundation For Agriculture Harvest For All Watershed Heroes Young Farmers and Ranchers Women's Committee FB Store FB Country AAIC AFBIS Farm Facts Working for You Farmers Care Order Form ((snip)) Hope it doesnt get too political there at the meeting. I dont see trying to not comply with the clean water acts and just get approval before arial spraying?! It seems that McDonalds has an invested interest with beef farmers and the likes, I wonder if the manager is encourage to hold meetings where the bureau may be bias and inturn the bias is quite influential to any attending. Could be interesting to see what everyone talks about though. I wonder if there is any gmo hype? new chems for the coming year? just thinking- Sue |