Shop Products
Houzz Logo Print
blaketaylore

round up

blaketaylore
13 years ago

It's always a choice of what one uses on their gardens, but I came across this article and found it very distrubing and thought I would share it, in case anyone had any interest in it.

Study Shows Monsanto Roundup Herbicide Link to Birth Defects

by F. William Engdahl


Global Research, September 30, 2010

engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net


A major new scientific study has confirmed growing conviction that the world�s most widely used chemical herbicide, Monsanto Corporation�s Roundup is toxic and a danger to human as well as animal organisms. The latest scientific research carried out by a multinational scientific team headed by Professor Andr�s Carrasco, head of the Laboratory of Molecular Embryology at the University of Buenos Aires Medical School and member of Argentina�s National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, presents alarming demonstration that Monsanto and the GMO agribusiness industry have systematically lied about the safety of their Roundup. Roundup in far lower concentrations than used in agriculture is linked to birth defects. The health implications are huge. All major GMO crops on the market today are genetically manipulated to "tolerate" the herbicide Roundup.

Glyphosate was patented by Monsanto in the 1970�s well before GMO was commercialized, as a so-called broad-spectrum weed killer. It is typically sprayed and absorbed through the leaves, or used as a forestry herbicide. It was initially patented and sold by Monsanto under the trade name Roundup, which also contains non-disclosed added chemicals the company refuses to divulge for "trade secret" reasons. As of 2005, 87% of all US soybean fields were planted with glyphosate-resistant varieties of GMO soybeans and sprayed with Roundup.

Because the seeds of Monsanto Roundup Ready GMO soybeans or other crops have been manipulated solely to be "resistant" to Roundup herbicide, while all other plant life in the field is killed by Roundup, farmers using Roundup Ready seeds must also purchase Roundup herbicide, making a captive market for both seed and chemicals.

The problem with this cozy arrangement, aside from the fact that Roundup-resistant "super-weeds" are emerging as a new biological catastrophe (see Katastrophale Folgen von GVO-Pflanzen in den USA � eine Lektion f�r die EU), is that Glyphosate has now been demonstrated to be linked to birth defects as one of the most highly toxic substances in agriculture. The US Government�s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), nonetheless continues to regard Roundup as "relatively low in toxicity, and without carcinogenic or teratogenic effects." In the United States the US Government notoriously relies on test data from Monsanto and the agribusiness industry to make safety rulings, under the 1992 doctrine of Substantial Equivalence which asserts that GMO seeds are "substantially equivalent" to ordinary seeds and thereby need no independent health or safety tests. While herbicides are treated slightly different, the fact that the agribusiness industry influences much of US Government policy has insured the most benign regulatory treatment of Roundup to date.

Alarming results

Now a new international scientific team headed by Prof. Andres Carrasco and including researchers from the UK, Brazil, USA, and Argentina have demonstrated that Glyphosate, the main active ingredient in Roundup causes malformations in frog and chicken embryos at doses far lower than those used in agricultural spraying and well below maximum residue levels in products presently approved in the European Union.[1] The Carrasco group was led to research the embryonic effects of glyphosate by reports of high rates of birth defects in rural areas of Argentina where Monsanto�s genetically modified "Roundup Ready" (RR) soybeans are grown in large monocultures sprayed from airplanes regularly. RR soy is engineered to tolerate Roundup, allowing farmers to spray the herbicide liberally to kill weeds while the crop is growing.

Carrasco presented his group�s findings at a press conference during the 6th European Conference of GMO Free Regions in the European Parliament in Brussels. He stated, "The findings in the lab are compatible with malformations observed in humans exposed to glyphosate during pregnancy."

Widespread reports of human malformations began to be reported in Argentina beginning 2002, two years after widespread aerial spraying of Roundup and planting of RR Soybeans was begun. The test animals used by Carrasco�s group share similar developmental mechanisms with humans. The authors concluded that the results "raise concerns about the clinical findings from human offspring in populations exposed to Roundup in agricultural fields." Carrasco added, "The toxicity classification of glyphosate is too low. In some cases this can be a powerful poison."

The maximum residue level (MRL) allowed for glyphosate in soy in the EU was raised 200-fold from 0.1 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg in 1997 after genetically manipulated Roundup Ready soy was commercialized in Europe. Carrasco found malformations in embryos injected with 2.03 mg/kg glyphosate. Soybeans can typically contain glyphosate residues of up to 17mg/kg.

In August 2010 an organized mob violently attacked people who gathered to hear Carrasco talk about his research in the town of La Leonesa, Chaco province. Witnesses implicated local agro-industry figures in the attack. Viviana Peralta, a housewife from San Jorge, Santa Fe, Argentina was hospitalized together with her baby after Roundup spraying from planes flying near her home. Peralta and other residents launched a lawsuit that resulted in a regional court ban on the spraying of Roundup and other agrochemicals near houses.

Note

1. Paganelli, A., Gnazzo, V., Acosta, H., L�pez, S.L., Carrasco, A.E. 2010. Glyphosate-based herbicides produce terato-genic effects on vertebrates by impairing retinoic acid signaling. Chem. Res. Toxicol., August 9. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/tx1001749

F. William Engdahl is a frequent contributor to Global Research. Global Research Articles by F. William Engdahl

Comments (2)

  • pixie_lou
    13 years ago
    last modified: 9 years ago

    This is an interesting article. And to be honest - it doesn't surprise me. I'm sure that any pesticide that is applied via airplane crop dusters has a negative effect on the populations living in those areas - human and animal.

    I use round up regularly - mainly I'm trying to eradicate poison ivy on my property. I like round up because I can control how much I use and where I use it. I can spray the poison ivy, but avoid many other native plants growing in the same area that I want to keep. I would never dream of spraying round up near food I was planning on consuming, nor would I ever spray it in an area where my young child was playing. Find me a study that shows that selective application via direct spray causes birth defects, then I'll listen to you.

  • littleonefb
    13 years ago
    last modified: 9 years ago

    Pixie lou,

    I've got to agree with you on the selective use of round up.

    The study may be a perfect example of "if a little bit is good, a lot is better" attitude.

    I can't even begin to imagine the ariel spraying use of Roundup not having extreme risks.

    On the other hand, selective use of it for such things as poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac is a "good thing." especially when applied directly to individual areas by hand.

    Like any other pesticide or herbicide that is marketed now, it is how you use it, how it is applied and where it is applied that can be the serious problem.

    AND,

    under certain circumstances, it can be the only choice that one has, to use roundup or some other chemical to control certain plants or dangerous insects.

    There is a group of people that are highly allergic to such things as poison ivy, oak and sumac and contact with them can result in a fatal or near fatal reaction.
    Allowing those plants to run amuck in a garden, yards, home properties is not something that can be allowed and strong measures are needed to control and eradicate them from the areas that are accessed by these people.

    The same can be said for such things as disease carrying mosquitos, carpenter ants, termites, etc.

    Personally, I have a daughter who is anaphylactic to poison ivy and almost died twice from exposure to it. Exposure being accidental both times and totally unaware of the problem with the first exposure.

    It has been a never ending battle over the years to eradicate poison ivy from the edges of the property and popping up in the yard, when she was young.

    We taught her at a very early age what to look for and stay away from at friends homes and on the sports fields that she played on.

    As an adult, now in her late 20's, she has no problem with staying away from poison ivy, and as a public school teacher for the past 5 years, she has had many students with the same problem as herself.

    Again, mass use, careless use, mass ariel application I can see a serious problem with, but selective application directly on the specific plants is a needed use of roundup, and until I see the same thing that Pixie Lou wants to see, studies that show the same results with the kind of application that both of us use, then I'm not concerned.

    Personally, I don't think that roundup is something that should be used for ariel spraying for anything, but then again, I'm not one that favors ariel spraying for weed control.

    Fran