Return to the Rose Propagation Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Posted by rjlinva 7VA (My Page) on
Sat, Oct 4, 08 at 5:44

I had some success starting some roses from seeds last winter, and I'm collecting hips now to try it again. I'm wondering if it's worth the time and space to try hips from some roses that are not disease resistant. My main objective is to get rose seedlings that are resistant to BS.

I'm considering especially Rugelda's hips, but she succombs terribly to BS in my garden.

Robert


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Self-pollinated seeds from disease prone varieties will produce disease prone seedlings..
If you want bs resistant seedlings, you need to get bs resistant varieties, then cross-pollinate them with other varieties; some of resulting seedlings will be disease resistant. My favorite parents for imparting disease resistance are Carefree Sunshine, Compassion, and some Bucks.
Good luck,
dave


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

That is a good question Robert. I notice that all my Scentimental seedlings get BS and Scentimental is very prone to BS. Elle is very disease free, and I have one seedling from her that is also very disease free, so I believe this is passed down to the decendents.


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

My hips are all open-pollinated at this time. In the future, I may try my hand at deliberate crosses.

The good news is that I have deliberately selected roses that are, at least, relatively disease resistant in my climate as I don't spray, so most of my offspring have a good chance of having two disease resistant parents.
Rugelda is a rose that I thought would be more disease resistant than it turned out to be. Rugelda has lots of hips, so I thought I might try to start some seeds.

Dave, I noticed you used the term "self-pollinated." Since my roses are all "open-pollinated" there is a good chance that the pollen came from another (healthier) rose. Does the healthier rose pollen offset the less healthy ova from the female?

Robert


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Robert,
Open-pollinated hips are generally self-pollinated, imo, but this is debatable.
A discussion at rosehybridizers.org claimed that bs resistance is dominant, which is very counter-intuitive imo;
in my experience, if you cross a healthy and less-healthy rose, some seedlings will be healthy and some will not be.


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Dave,

Thanks for the response.
Robert


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Regarding Rugelda:
Surprising that it is not very healthy, as it was ADR 1992.
Some folks at rosehybridizers.org have used it in breeding; you could search their forum to see what has been done with it.
Rugelda is a rugosa (?); many rugosas are NOT self-fertile, so your op hips may be crosses, not selfs, which contradicts what I said in post above. Sorry for confusion!!


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Dave,

My Rugelda looks healthy right now...go figure. It's still a young plant and might be just growing up. I will definitely try some hips from her.

BTW...do you know whether Frau Dagmar Hastrup is one of the many rugosas that are NOT self-fertile? How do you find this information?

Robert


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Where did you find Rugelda - it is an unusual variety.
Does it look like a typical rugosa? Robusta is a hybrid rug, but it is a very long way from a typical rugosa.
FDH is very near species, so my guess is that itis not self fertile; you should ask about self-infertility on the RHA forum. I have no experience breeding regosas.


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

The question about rugosa self-infertility has been posted on rha forum.


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

dave,
I found Rugelda at Sherando Roses, and it looks almost nothing like a rugosa. The leaves are glossy, and the flowers are yellow with orange trim.

Can I ask how you know that FDH is very near species? I have tried to find the parentage of this rose unsuccessfully.

Robert


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Paul Geurt's comment on the rha thread: "FDH looks pretty much like a straight R. rugosa clone with little or no other species or variety in it, so it is probably self-infertile."


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

I have not been posting on this forum for a very long time since my wife has been fighting bone cancer for over 7 years.
On April 7th 2008 she lost her battle with this terrible illness !

THIS IS A VERY GOOD QUESTION !
It's at all possible that two disease proned roses could produce very healthy seedlings.
Here my answer :
After 39 years of hybridizing I come to the conclusion that it is 99 percent luck and only one percent planning.

Some years back I crossed two roses which never ever had mildew in years. I only spray my roses about 3 to 5 times a season.
I had about 500 seedlings and mildew spread like wildfire. After throwing out every mildewed seedling I had only five (5) left.
Read my article on my websites Article Page :
"25 Years of Breeding for Disease Resistance"
Link to my site below.

George Mander

Here is a link that might be useful: Roses of Excellence


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Our condolences to you, Mr. Mander.
dave wolfe


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Hello Mr. Mander, welcome back to the forum.
I am so sorry for your loss, I extend my heartfelt sympathy to you.

Do you believe that seedlings outgrow the mildew problems, somewhat? The reason I ask is because I have had some seedlings that were full of PM and I was going to toss them but decided to keep them and the next year they did not have near as much as when they did the previous year.
And all of my roses get PM especially in the spring and fall, contributed mostly by the damp weather and low temps at night.


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

I am sorry to hear about your loss. I appreciate your comments. I kind of suspected this was the case.

Robert


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Thank you for your condolences, daveinohio_2007,ramblinrosez7b and rjlinva.

My answer to ramblinrosez7b :
Yes, some seedlings outgrow the mildew problems when moved from indoors to outside.
I had a number of them with slight mildew problems, but when outside these were very resistant.
But those which are loaded with mildew inside that the stems bent, these I throw out.
Good luck to all of you.

George Mander

Here is a link that might be useful: Roses of Excellence


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Dr. Mander,
I'm also sorry about your loss.

You have a very interesting website. I hope you'll keep posting here..I know a number of people are just learning about growing from seeds, including me.

I wonder why people think op seeds are necessarily self-pollinated. I'd think there would be a good chance a bee had crossed it with something else. I keep hoping that my op seeds might have traits of neighboring roses. I do plan to try to cross some myself next spring. So far my op Blush Noisette seedlings look just like Blush Noisette. Have you found often that a rose with a small bloom like Ballerina can result in a larger flowered rose? Ballerina sure puts out a lot of hips.

Have you frozen pollen for use the following spring?
Thanks,
Linda


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

In a word, yes....absolutely. Disease resistance can appear out of nowhere at times, from some of the worst parents. However, the inverse is much more often the case, but thats roses for you!


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

It certainly seems counterinuitive that disease resistance is less common...from an evolutionary standpoint, anyhow.

Robert


 o
RE: Are seedlings of disease proned roses ever healthier?

Robert,
The problem came from using species from a variety of vastly different climates. Many species, although perfectly clean in their native habitat, become VERY diseased in climates they were not designed to grow in. Breeding these various species together breaks down whatever disease resistance one species may have had. Cross Species X from China with Species Y from Montana and you can anticipate all kinds of problems will arise because of the recombination of wildly differing genes. Breeding for disease resistance is, in fact, a big mess.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Rose Propagation Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here