Return to the Woodlands Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Should I harvest lumber

Posted by mattkalman (My Page) on
Sat, Apr 12, 14 at 13:52

I have over 20 acres of woodland on my property in upstate New York. A guy came by, walked my woods with me and said that I could make a few thousand by responsibly harvesting some of the bigger trees. He said it would be good for the health of the forest as well. Is this true? Can selective harvesting of less than half of my mature growth be good for the woods?


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Should I harvest lumber

Matt, I know nothing about forestry, but I just happened to have checked out a fascinating book from the library called Growing Trees from Seed, by Henry Kock. In it he says:

"Forests are still being trashed by irresponsible forestry operators or high-graded by unscrupulous log buyers arriving on rural doorsteps with checkbook in hand."

"Ecological forestry, as practiced in its best form, takes pride in carefully selecting only trees that are starting to decline and even leaving some of those for predator habitat. It leaves the healthiest trees standing to produce the best seeds for renewing the forest. Future forestry, practiced in this way, should involve no tree planting at all."

Of course, it all depends on what your intention was when you got the land. In any case, this is one opinion for you to think about.

Kat


 o
RE: Should I harvest lumber

Kat mentions some important points, among them the unwise practice of "highgrading" which consists of harvesting only the largest and best stems from the stand. Doing this has the tendency to systematically remove the best genetics, not always, but too often. If one knows that the smaller trees in their woods are that way because they are simply younger, this issue would not apply. But to simply remove the biggest and best stuff could gravitate towards high grading, I'm afraid. Once enough folks decided clearcutting was a bad thing-it's not always-then a wave of size-selection swept across the land, and this was indeed high grading in many cases. I hope this gives you something to think about.

Even in so simple a system as a pine plantation, I've seen huge benefits to doing periodic thinnings, but only if the poorest and smallest stock was removed, not the biggest and most valuable. In the scenario I outline here, the biggest and best are then allowed to grow on and attain even greater size and value, the very opposite of high grading.

+oM


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Woodlands Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here