Return to the Woodlands Forum
| Post a Follow-Up
Ethics of woodland wildflowers
| | |
Posted by fivemurfs 7 (My Page) on Thu, Apr 3, 08 at 23:49
| While I don't disagree that it is wrong to dig plants from the wild, I do wonder if dire warnings against doing so prevents people from actively helping to preserve rare species. I live on the edge of a large city where invasive honeysuckle, and ivy and periwinkle gone wild are threatening the rarer natives, like trillium, mayapples, phlox and bluebells on private property. Large tracts of land marked for subdivisions, shopping malls and the likes are insuring destruction and extinction of some species.
It seems to me that along with the admonition not to dig in the wild, it would be doing a great service to encourage people to rescue these rare wildflowers in an ethical manner.
It is not wrong to approach a land owner whose woodlands are being invaded, or who has acquired property for development, and ask permission to dig up these precious plants and relocate them to a safe place where they will thrive and multiply. I've done this on more than one occasion and with the owners permission I dig and replant on my own property.
Left alone, these beauties spread out by roots much more quickly than those sewn in a nursery from seeds. And while it takes several years, they self sow as well. I share these plants freely with friends, and although it's not perfect, it is a practical way to preserve these species for future generations.
And it also seems to me it would not be wrong to sell these fully developed rescued plants commercially at reasonable prices. I know people who do. So why assume that a reasonably priced wildflower was stolen? What happens to the beautiful specimens that no one buys for fear they were gotten by illegal means? Is their fate any different from those that are plowed under by bulldozers or smothered by invasive ground covers?
For the sake of discussion, what say you?
|
Follow-Up Postings:
RE: Ethics of woodland wildflowers
| | |
| NC Native Plant Society has a pro-rescue statement as does the GA group. I believe the VA group promotes saving the habitat rather than rescue. I would be the first to state that saving an entire ecosystem is the best way, but NC is one of the fastest growing states, and we are losing land every day to development. IF we can get permission and find out in time, local groups try to rescue. We give plants to others, to public parks/schools/churces, and of course, keep them for our own gardens. Llegally you are supposed to get a permit to sell, and I do know some nursery owners who do that. Many years ago most nurseries dug from the wild until our eyes were "opened" to the threat of wiping out the natural habitat. Now established nurseries only get wild dug plants if they come from sites to be destroyed. AND, if these plants are on the state/federal endangered or threatened lists, the nurseries have to get a special permit to sell...very time consuming paperwork, and some rare plants are left to the bulldozer because of it. There does need to be some regulations, and it bothers me when I visit a farmers' market in the mt. and see plants that obviously were dug just that morning. Of course, in NC on private property you can treat your plants any way you want to...just are not supposed to sell the ones on that list. I must state that our group ALWAYS gets permission to enter property to dig. Otherwise you are guilty of stealing, trespassing, and heavens knows what else. I have seen many plants destroyed because we could not get permission. What a shame! However, each person has to make his own ethical decision, but in leading a group, I always go "by the rules." |
|
|
|
|
